Syria Demands U.S. Apology and Compensation

October 30th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

In response to a U.S. raid on a building in Syria last Sunday, the Syrian government demanded an apology from the United States Wednesday, and said it expected compensation for the damage caused by the attack.

The United States said the strike against the Syrian target had been carried out because a prominent Al Qaeda member was hiding in the building, from which foreign Al Qaeda fighters were smuggled into Iraq.

Syria’s Deputy Foreign Minister Fayssal Mekdad told the Associated Press that this was not the case. “We ask of them (Iraqis) and the Americans to investigate and provide us with the background for such a criminal, terrorist act against an independent state … (and) make an official apology for this aggression and pledge not to repeat it,” he said.

What is required of the American government is to confess to this aggression and not be cowardly.”

“The allegation that this person was killed is a false claim. Therefore, a search for him by world intelligence agencies, including Syria’s, should continue,” Mekdad said.

The U.S. Embassy in Syria meanwhile warned Americans in that country. “The American community in Syria should be aware that unforeseen events or circumstances may occur that could cause the U.S. Embassy in Damascus to close to the public for an unspecified period of time,” the embassy said in a statement published on its website.

And so the situation in the region continues to escalate, but, for now, Syria’s talking the tough talk, but not walking the walk. One could argue that the Syrians are quite powerless when it comes to acting against U.S. strikes against targets in Syria. The Syrian military is relatively weak, and the U.S. has enough forces in Iraq to make it increasingly difficult for Syria to smuggle terrorists into Iraq in order to fight the U.S. there.

However, the more the U.S. steps up its efforts against Syria the more likely it is that Damascus will focus on Lebanon and try to control it again. This is something the U.S. should keep in mind when it acts against Syria – the Syrians are not as powerless as some may think; they can strike against U.S. interests in other parts of the region.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Interested
    October 30th, 2008 at 10:36
    Reply | Quote | #1

    i think an appropriate answer would be to repeat the actions twice.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.