Tensions Increase in Syria

October 30th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Tensions between the United States and Syria continued to rise Thursday as Syrian riot police were forced to form a security ring around the United States embassy in Damascus due to a government-organized protest.

The protest attracted thousands of Syrians angry with the U.S. for carrying out a deadly strike against a target in Syria last Sunday.

Luckily for embassy personnel, the crowd dispersed peacefully, however, because most protesters had to either go to class or to work.

The embassy itself was closed today due to security concerns. U.S. officials feared that extremists might use the protest to launch violent attacks against the embassy, and warned Americans living in Syria to remain in doors, or at least not enter the part of Damascus where the protest was organized.

Although anonymous U.S. officials claim that the raid against the building in Syria was necessary in order to take out a leader of the terrorist organization Al Qaeda in Iraq, Syria says that all victims were innocent civilians. It demands an apology and compensation from Washington.

Washington itself has not publicly responded to the Syrian allegations nor officially given an explanation for the raid. Anonymous sources say, however, that the target was a leader of Al Qaeda in Iraq, Badran Turki al-Mazidih, who also goes by the name of Abu Ghadiyah.

One of the protesters told reporters that the goal of the protest was to force the United States to “stop their acts of terrorism in Syria, in Iraq and the rest of the world.” Protesters waved flags of Syrian President Bashar Assad and held anti-America banners.

Syria, meanwhile, threatened to stop securing its border with Iraq, which is important for both Baghdad and Washington because many foreign extremists have entered Iraq through the Syrian-Iraqi border. Then again, the U.S. believes that Syria is not doing nearly enough to secure the border, meaning that the attack was probably worth the risk of alienating Damascus.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Interested
    October 31st, 2008 at 04:19
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Hard for Syria to stop securing something they are not securing to begin with

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.