Down Syndrome Boy Residence Denies in Australia

November 1st, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Dr. Bernhard Moeller moved with his family to Australia two years ago, in order to help solve the country’s shortage of doctors in rural areas. He found a home in the rural region of southeastern Victoria state, in the town of Horsham.

Immediately after arrival, Moeller became the only internal medicine specialist for a community of 54,000 people. The community got to know him, embraced him and his family, and became heavily dependent on his knowledge.

Moeller got a temporary residence permit until 2010. Earlier this year, he requested a permanent residence permit, because he and his wife enjoyed Australia and because the community needed them.

The request was denied, however. The reason: Dr. Moeller has a son with Down Syndrome. The federal government informed the family that the son did not meet the “health requirements.” As a result, the entire family will have to leave in 2010, and the community will be without a doctor.

The community is not accepting the way things have gone, however. Thousands of them raised their voice in anger, arguing that they need and want the Moellers to stay. Australian and international media jumped on the story, as did Virginia state politicians, all of whom have promised to talk to the federal government and immigration authorities in order to secure a permit for the family nonetheless.

In its decision, the Department of Immigration and Citizenship cited Lukas’ “existing medical condition,” saying it was “likely to result in a significant and ongoing cost to the Australian community,” according to a statement Thursday, as reported by CNN.

“This is not discrimination. A disability in itself is not grounds for failing the health requirement — it is a question of the cost implications to the community,” the statement said.

“They think he is a burden for the Australian community,” Moeller told Melbourne radio station 3AW. “But we are absolutely able to support him, and I don’t want him to rely on any government pension anyway. He’s well looked after. And actually, he can contribute to the community here. He already is contributing to it.”

He added that immigration officials “weren’t even interested in what we have done and are able to do for him.”

Moeller’s son Lukas attends a mainstream elementary school. He has an aide helping him out, receives speech therapy and plays soccer, cricket, golf and table tennis.

The Moellers come from Germany. The head of the Down Syndrome InfoCenter in Germany told CNN he considered the Australian decision “outlandish.”

“The case with the Australian authorities is disappointing and unacceptable, especially because Australia has very advanced programs for people with Down syndrome, far more than in Germany,” she said.

Another person working for a Down Syndrome organization, David Tolleson, executive director of the Atlanta, Georgia-based National Down Syndrome Congress added: “What is the cost implication to the community of a doctor shortage?” Tolleson asked. “I assume the son had the same costs for the last two years, and they were happy to have the family and use the dad as a doctor.”

It will be interesting to see whether reporters will ask Sarah Palin about this case. Her 6-month year old son, Trig, also has Down Syndrome. She, unlike 90% of the women in her situation, decided to give birth to him, and now often talks about helping families with Down Syndrome children, arguing that there is much the government can do to help these families out and to make such children “feel welcome.”

Whatever the case, the Australian government clearly does not welcome Lukas Moeller.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Parker Stacy
    November 2nd, 2008 at 02:49
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Australia has just lost several points on the world stage. What a slap in the face. Dr. Moeller should relocate his family to a permanent location in a country that appreciates and respects his contributions and his family.

  2. Rudi666
    November 2nd, 2008 at 05:30
    Reply | Quote | #2

    So much for socialized medicine in Australia and legal immigrants. But over here in the US most insurance companies wouldn’t insure the kid or cap the families medical payouts.

  3. Robert
    November 2nd, 2008 at 06:41
    Reply | Quote | #3

    It is a great pity the emotive has taken over from the reality.

    Dr Moeller was welcomed on a Work Visa .

    He has recently sought Permanent Residence

  4. ernest olson
    November 10th, 2008 at 09:23
    Reply | Quote | #4

    A difficult issue. Medical care costs money and if you open your borders to everyone for free medical care you will eventually bankrupt the system. On the other hand Mr Evans didn’t make the law but he needs to address it and the total benefit of solid families that are answering Australia’s call for services. This family has the means to and will provide for their child. The Doctors positives services will have a far greater impact than any cost that will be in cured if at all for one child. Plus these children teach in unseen ways, that cant be explained but most definately experienced, I’ve witnessed it and it is powerful and good. In addition this family has two other siblings that are already concerned, productive and socially caring people and they will be assets to AU. The family is intact another good social example and positive force. A simple cost analysis deserves a common sense approach. The standing law needs to be applied so that other National Assets that can contribute to the greater good will be welcomed so they can help those less fortunate to mend and learn. These are the types of immigrants that make a country great and there is no doubt that the land dwn under is by the nature if its people a great nation. s/USA

  5. ernest olson
    November 10th, 2008 at 09:47
    Reply | Quote | #5

    correction…..standing law needs to be readdressed and modified so that other National assets that can contribute to the greater good will,,,,s/USA

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.