Latest Poll: McCain Surges, Obama Slips

November 1st, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The latest Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby poll shows that Sen. John McCain continues to close the gap with Sen. Barack Obama. According to the poll released Saturday, Obama now has a 5-point lead.

Important is that he polled below 50%, namely 49.1%. Most experts believe that Obama has to poll constantly above 50% if he wants to win by as much as some commentators expect. If not, said experts have said in recent weeks, it could be much closer on election day than the ‘mainstream media’ have told us.

The main reason for McCain’s modest surge is that he is doing increasingly better among Independent voters. Where Obama held a considerable 15% lead among Independent voters earlier this week, that number has now been reduced to 6%.

Among women too, McCain has improved his numbers, according to Zogby. Obama’s lead among women has decreased from 9 points to only four.

“There is no doubt that McCain made some gains,” said pollster John Zogby. “It is enough to raise the question, is McCain making a move?”

The McCain campaign, meanwhile, is becoming increasingly optimistic. Campaigning in Ohio with California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger McCain himself said: “I know a winning campaign when I see one. We’re a couple of points back. Arnold said it best. The Mac is back.”

I continue to believe that Obama will win the election, however. His poll numbers have consistently been better and McCain has not polled above 45% in too long a time. 45% seems to be his maximum, which is not enough to win.

On the other hand, Tuesday could prove to be relatively close, which would be important because it would keep Obama and his team on their toes. If Obama wins in a landslide, he and his followers will believe they can pursue the ‘radical changes’ Obama wants to pursue, and has pursued throughout his political career. If, however, the race is close, he will realize that he may lose reelection if he acts ‘too liberal.’

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.