The War on Aunt Zeituni

November 1st, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

When I first reported about Barack Obama’s aunt Zeituni Onyango some readers accused me of hypocrisy because I wrote weeks ago that Bristol Palin, Sarah Palin’s daughter, was off limits, as was her son Trig. The two cases were, according to these pro-Obama readers, equal.

Sadly, however, they are not.

Here is where they are different: the post was not about Onyango, but about Obama. It was further proof that Obama does not practice what he preaches. He talks about helping ‘the poor’ constantly, but he and his wife Michelle donate little to nothing to charity. Instead, he wants to take your money away, and give it to people such as his aunt, whom he refuses to help with his own money.

Palin wants teachers to teach students that “the best way” not to become pregnant is by not having intercourse. She does not, however, want to force any underaged girls not to become pregnant; she simply wants to teach them that if they refrain from having sex, they will not get pregnant. It can be quite safely assumed that she also taught her daughter this. Her daughter, however, made her own decisions in life, and acted differently.

But Palin does not want to force anyone to act like she would ‘like’ them to, Obama does.

So far for the comparison.

Overnight something else happened, and this is disturbing. Some conservatives have found out that Onyango is an illegal alien in the United States. She requested asylum, but the U.S. government did not grant her request. The government then told her she should leave the country, but she fled and stayed in the U.S.

Although it would be fascinating to hear this woman’s life story, those who go after both her and Obama on this subject are crossing the line of decency and normal political discourse. This aunt is not running for president, Obama is. It is fair to look at how he treats relatives, especially if he bragged about having great relationships with them in his books, but those relatives themselves cannot be touched.

Some readers of conservative blog Ace of Spades argued that Onyango’s status indicates Obama may have known his aunt was in the country illegally and may even have assisted her. If Obama was running on a strict anti-illegal immigration platform, calling on friends and relatives of illegal immigrants to report those people to immigration officials so they can be deported, Obama could potentially be criticized. But that is not the case. Obama is not pretending to be a hardliner on the issue of immigration.

Furthermore, Onyango is Obama’s aunt. If Obama knew she was here illegally, and he probably did, does anyone truly suggest he should have reported her to authorities? His own aunt? That is what the Hitler Jugend and youth organizations in the Soviet Union did. But in any normal, humane society, such behavior would be condemned as immoral, unthankful and worse. It would be betrayal of the worst kind: betrayal of one’s own relatives. It does not get much worse than that. Not in any decent society, at least.

Additionally, since the issue of Onyango’s status as an illegal alien does not tell us anything about Obama being a hypocrite or worse, the only net effect of making this a big issue is to attack a person who is not running for office. This woman should be considered off limits.

Lastly, there is one thing about Onyango’s illegal status that is significant: she donated more than $200 to Obama’s campaign. Foreigners, which Onyango is, are not allowed to donate to any campaign, however, and if they do so nonetheless, the campaign itself has to act by refusing to accept the money. There are many security checks that would normally prevent someone like Onyango from donating to Obama’s campaign, but the latter has made the conscious decision not to implement those checks other campaigns use.

In this regard, then, Onyango’s illegal immigrant status is only significant in so far that it once again shows that Obama accepts money from foreigners. On the other hand, that is nothing new. We already knew that – there is an abundance of evidence to back up this claim. As such, using Onyango as the evidence for this matter is nonsense and gives decent observers the impression that the ‘donation’ aspect is an excuse, not a reason to write about Onyango.

We have discovered Obama’s aunt, and it once again clear that Obama does not practice what he preaches when it comes to helping people and that his campaign accepts illegal contributions. But that should be the end of the Onyango story.

The left has crossed the line on a variety of occassions this year and there were rightfully called out when they did. The right should now be careful not to cross the line as well.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Gary Morris
    November 1st, 2008 at 18:04
    Reply | Quote | #1

    So, Mr. Obama’s choices were only two:
    1) Report her; and
    2) Help her because she is poor.

    Furthermore, you state: “…Additionally, since the issue of Onyango’s status as an illegal alien does not tell us anything about Obama being a hypocrite or worse, the only net effect of making this a big issue is to attack a person who is not running for office.”

    I submit it tells us a whole lot about Obama and hypocrisy is only the beginning.

    I note that the Obama campaign wasted no time tossing ‘beloved’ Aunt Zeituni under the bus.

    Obama Camp: Senator Knew Nothing About Aunt’s Illegal Immigration Status

    November 01, 2008 11:50 AM
    http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/11/obama-camp-sena.html

    How long before the candidate himself comes out and says,
    ” Ahhh,,uuummmmmm, she’s not the Aunt Zeituni I knew…”

    Let’s spread the (manure) around…

  2. Kaspar
    November 1st, 2008 at 18:28
    Reply | Quote | #2

    So you think he should have covertly given money to his aunt at a risk for his own campaign? Or is a US citizen allowed to sustain illegal immigrants even when they are not in dire need of charity? I have no real problem with the post, on the contrary, I just wonder what the real gist is.

  3. Michael van der Galien
    November 1st, 2008 at 18:48
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Kaspar: You know what’s interesting: Obama says he did not know she was illegal. In other words: yeah, he should’ve helped her.

  4. James T Webb Master Builder
    November 1st, 2008 at 19:02
    Reply | Quote | #4
  5. Don Malvo
    November 1st, 2008 at 19:16
    Reply | Quote | #5

    The depths to which some will sink to sway voters is deplorable to the point of being sickening. What does a poor old woman who risked everything she had to come to America and try to make a better life for herself, who scrounged up all she could to support her nephew, a nephew whom she has every reason to be proud of… what does any of this have to do with Obama being elected president? If McCain seizes on this opportunity and somehow seeks to use it against his opponent, I will lose every single shred of the tiny bit of respect I have left for him.

  6. Jimmie
    November 1st, 2008 at 19:18
    Reply | Quote | #6

    What’s most interesting about this story, Michael, is that we’re just finding this out about his aunt (who he wrote about by name in one of his two autobiographies) yet we know next to everything about Sarah Palin’s 17 year old daughter’s fiancee and her Down’s syndrome child.

    Ask yourself this. Why do you know the names of at least two of Sarah Palin’s kids but not of Barack Obama’s. Doesn’t it seem strange to you that the media has told us more about the VP candidate on the Republican side than the Presidential candidats on the Democrats’ side?

  7. C Stanley
    November 1st, 2008 at 19:36
    Reply | Quote | #7

    Hell, Jimmie, I know the name of Sarah’s daughter’s fiancee and I know the sexual orientation of one of her best friends from high school! Not to mention (unfortunately) her husband’s former business partner who was dragged through the mud with no justification.

    And then there’s Joe the plumber- will Don Malvo at least acknowledge how scummy and frightening it is that this guy who dared to ask a question which caused Obama some political embarrassment had his private life INVESTIGATED by Democratic state officials??

  8. BlueState
    November 2nd, 2008 at 17:04
    Reply | Quote | #8

    Obama’s aunt is not an illegal alien. She’s a fugitive of a deportation order. Why should that be kept secret in governmental computers?

  9. Grewgills
    November 2nd, 2008 at 19:53
    Reply | Quote | #9

    Is this evidence of the Republicans descent into totalitarianism?

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.