U.S. Debt - 50 Years Via
As one can see, it is not correct to argue, as some have in recent months, that Democrats are much better at reducing the national debt. At least, not in general terms. The last three Republican presidents, however, have been horrific in this regard: Nixon, Ford and Eisenhower were all prudent spenders, the Reaganite conservatives, however, not.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
On Twitter
I don’t know why anybody even takes the argument seriously, Michael. If you wanted to stretch the logic even further, you could say that FDR created the largest increase in debt, and therefore Democrats are the least fiscally responsible.
But we know FDR’s spending had to do with World War II, that Reagan’s spending had to do with both the Cold War and the fact that he was working with a Democratic Congress, and that Clinton had to work with a Republican Congress.
We can also speculate on some of the reasons that the deficit went up under Bush, but we have to get away from dumb talking points first.
Michael, come on…
As one can see, it is absolutely correct to argue in general terms that Democrats are better at reducing the debt than Republicans since 6 out of the 6 Democratic administrations in the last 58 years have done so.
On the other hand, the debt has gone up dramatically under 5 out of the 9 Republican administrations in that same time period.
So 45% of the time the Republicans reduce the debt and 100% of the time the Democrats do.
Case closed.
Justin,
Again–lets expand the chart to include FDR’s presidency. You really can’t be serious
Shush, redfish! Justin said the case is closed! LOL
Can we get time machines made more quickly so I can go back and vote for Ike?
Anyway, Redfish, the Republicans had control of the Senate under Reagan for six years. I haven’t studied the period well. Was this a time when they simply sucked at gathering votes like the Dems are now?
Because it’s generally more difficult to get legislation through the Senate, but the Republicans were able to do it pretty handily during Bush 43’s first six.
@redfish
Yes, I’m serious because my comment was about Michael’s incorrect characterization of this graph.
I completely agree with your point about FDR, but let’s remember what he had to go through. Do you really think we would have pulled out of the Great Depression and won WWII without increasing our debt?
Justin,
Yes, but why am I allowed to take in the context of FDR’s presidency but not the context of Reagan or Clinton’s presidency?
Or even the context of GWB’s presidency- if you’re going to allow for the situation of ‘going through’ the Great Depression, how about also considering what Bush has had to lead through the last eight years? 9/11, worst terrorist attack on American soil; two wars (OK, even granting that only one of them is considered necessary by many people); Katrina, worst natural disaster in American history; and now the financial market meltdown? I’d dare say that combination of crises is pretty unprecedented, and while it doesn’t excuse all of the spending mentality it does make it a bit unfair to compare his budget to say, Ike, JFK, Nixon, Ford, and Clinton.
“Reagan’s spending had to do with both the Cold War”
As opposed to Truman, Ike, Kennedy, LBJ, Nixon, Ford, and Carter?
As MM pointed out Reagan had a Senate with a slim R advantage for most of his presidency.
Come on now, take off the ideological blinders.
The spending is of course depending on the country’s needs and also based on the intelligence of the financial minister. Between individuals, there are different way of thinking thus the spending is also different.