<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Accepting the Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/04/accepting-the-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/04/accepting-the-results/</link>
	<description>Because Common Sense Transcends Distance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:50:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: C Stanley</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/04/accepting-the-results/comment-page-1/#comment-76418</link>
		<dc:creator>C Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=8667#comment-76418</guid>
		<description>Grewgills- of course I want voter fraud to be exceedingly rare- but that won&#039;t happen until people admit that voter ID laws are necessary to combat it (and up until now, there&#039;s been opposition to them on the basis that some contend that this measure is really an attempt to disenfranchise voters, and the rationale for that is that it&#039;s been said that fraud isn&#039;t a real problem.)

Both fraud and disenfranchised need to be addressed- we need to stop allowing one party to claim that only one side of that problem is real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grewgills- of course I want voter fraud to be exceedingly rare- but that won&#8217;t happen until people admit that voter ID laws are necessary to combat it (and up until now, there&#8217;s been opposition to them on the basis that some contend that this measure is really an attempt to disenfranchise voters, and the rationale for that is that it&#8217;s been said that fraud isn&#8217;t a real problem.)</p>
<p>Both fraud and disenfranchised need to be addressed- we need to stop allowing one party to claim that only one side of that problem is real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grewgills</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/04/accepting-the-results/comment-page-1/#comment-76416</link>
		<dc:creator>Grewgills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=8667#comment-76416</guid>
		<description>&quot;I just hope that this puts lie to the frequent Democratic claims that voter fraud doesn’t exist.&quot;
Why?  Wouldn&#039;t you be happier to have it confirmed that voter fraud was/is exceedingly rare?  That would certainly be a better indicator of the health of our system.  I think that&#039;s what we all want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I just hope that this puts lie to the frequent Democratic claims that voter fraud doesn’t exist.&#8221;<br />
Why?  Wouldn&#8217;t you be happier to have it confirmed that voter fraud was/is exceedingly rare?  That would certainly be a better indicator of the health of our system.  I think that&#8217;s what we all want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Stanley</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/04/accepting-the-results/comment-page-1/#comment-76385</link>
		<dc:creator>C Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=8667#comment-76385</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;m glad you gave the material I posted a reading before dismissing it, Michael ;-)

Just joking- we all have to come to our own conclusions and vote our consciences. I do appreciate that you were willing to look at materials that might have challenged your views.

For anyone who missed it the first time, here&#039;s the comment that Michael is referring to:
http://www.poligazette.com/2008/10/27/back-to-the-fence/#comment-74871

If you&#039;re a reader and are still on the fence before going to the polls today, please read it!

Oh, and Michael as a McCain supporter I agree about accepting the results. I do feel some concern about the voter fraud issues, but even with that I don&#039;t think the election should be contested (and although I don&#039;t want an Obama landslide, I actually hope that if he does win that it will be enough of a margin so that the legitimacy isn&#039;t questionable.) Having said that though, I think it&#039;s essential that the fraud be thoroughly investigated and I just hope that this puts lie to the frequent Democratic claims that voter fraud doesn&#039;t exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;m glad you gave the material I posted a reading before dismissing it, Michael <img src='http://www.poligazette.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Just joking- we all have to come to our own conclusions and vote our consciences. I do appreciate that you were willing to look at materials that might have challenged your views.</p>
<p>For anyone who missed it the first time, here&#8217;s the comment that Michael is referring to:<br />
<a href="http://www.poligazette.com/2008/10/27/back-to-the-fence/#comment-74871" rel="nofollow">http://www.poligazette.com/2008/10/27/back-to-the-fence/#comment-74871</a></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a reader and are still on the fence before going to the polls today, please read it!</p>
<p>Oh, and Michael as a McCain supporter I agree about accepting the results. I do feel some concern about the voter fraud issues, but even with that I don&#8217;t think the election should be contested (and although I don&#8217;t want an Obama landslide, I actually hope that if he does win that it will be enough of a margin so that the legitimacy isn&#8217;t questionable.) Having said that though, I think it&#8217;s essential that the fraud be thoroughly investigated and I just hope that this puts lie to the frequent Democratic claims that voter fraud doesn&#8217;t exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Merritt</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/04/accepting-the-results/comment-page-1/#comment-76383</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Merritt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=8667#comment-76383</guid>
		<description>Oh, I had no delusions of trying to change any one&#039;s mind.  The article was own thought process post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I had no delusions of trying to change any one&#8217;s mind.  The article was own thought process post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orson Buggeigh</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/04/accepting-the-results/comment-page-1/#comment-76380</link>
		<dc:creator>Orson Buggeigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=8667#comment-76380</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;ll be off to vote for McCain in a few hours when the polls open here on the west coast.  I read your article, and I thank you for sharing your thoughts - but I did not find your case for not voting for McCain to be enough to move me.  But, of course, that&#039;s the point of blogs - an exchange of ideas.  More on my blog article shortly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ll be off to vote for McCain in a few hours when the polls open here on the west coast.  I read your article, and I thank you for sharing your thoughts &#8211; but I did not find your case for not voting for McCain to be enough to move me.  But, of course, that&#8217;s the point of blogs &#8211; an exchange of ideas.  More on my blog article shortly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interested</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/04/accepting-the-results/comment-page-1/#comment-76329</link>
		<dc:creator>Interested</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 05:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=8667#comment-76329</guid>
		<description>well it&#039;s in motion now.

First in the nation voting goes 15-6</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well it&#8217;s in motion now.</p>
<p>First in the nation voting goes 15-6</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
