Arabs Not Hopeful About Change

November 4th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Although American supporters of Sen. Barack Obama often talk about “change” and “hope,” people living in the Middle East believe that even if Obama would win – Obama is considered more pro-Arab than Sen. John McCain – little to nothing will change.

When asked whether the U.S. elections matter to them, 62% of readers of AlArabiya.net said they do not because “either way the new president will be an avid supporter of Israel.”

The average Arab believes that Obama is inherently less hostile to the Arab world than McCain, but fear that he will not be able to change U.S. foreign policy much.

32% of Arabs living in the Middle East said they believed U.S. policy would remain the same, a recent Zogby poll showed, while 18% believed Obama had the best chance of advancing peace. Only 4% said the same about John McCain, who is considered an extension of George W. Bush.

Perhaps surprisingly to may, 13% of Arabs said they wanted Obama to lose because they consider Democrats “anti-religion.” 26% wanted McCain to lose because of his “anti-Arab” views and policies.

As can be seen, just add up the numbers, many Arabs believe that neither candidate will truly be different and come up with an entirely new policy for the Middle East.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.