Christiane Amanpour Makes a Fool of Herself

November 4th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

CNN ‘journalist’ Christiane Amanpour just made a terrible fool of herself on international television. She told ‘the world’ that today’s election will “change the world.”

A normal, objective and above all professional journalist would never say such a thing. This election will most definitely not change the world, at least not in such a radical way she supposes.

Rather, her statement – see also this blogpost of CNN’s “Chief International Correspondent” – indicates that she is a hack, above all. An overly emotional, subjective and uninformed hack at that.

Both Obama and McCain will do what they consider in the interest of the United States. Their views may differ to a significant extent, but the goal of both will be to protect America’s interests, not “change the world” (despite Obama’s ridiculously over-the-top rhetoric that he and his supporters “are going to change the world”).

Lets put this stuff in perspective: today’s election is important, but neither candidate is going to “change the world” to any significant degree. Some crisis may happen but we’ll survive those, in the end, and the world… will be the problem.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Tess
    November 4th, 2008 at 23:49
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I don’t think she made a fool of herself at all. If Obama wins the election the general reception of the US within the global cummunity will go from negative to positive overnight. That in and of itself is a huge change. Obama is a man of incredible substance and intellect, which we haven’t seen in a US President for some time. His potential is great and I expect that he will be a vessel for positive change in the US and the world.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.