MSNBC: Rahm Emanuel Accepts Chief of Staff Offer

November 5th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Via MSNBC comes the news that Rahm Emanuel has accepted Barack Obama’s offer to become his Chief of Staff.

Emanuel is a highly partisan and ideological Democrat, who has a long record of bullying opponents into submission, and throwing swear words around whenever agitated (which happens rather often).

Nonetheless, one could also argue that he has a strong character, which any president needs in a Chief of Staff, but Obama especially.

Those ‘buts’ aside, I agree with NRO’s Yuval Levin when he writes that Obama’s choice for Chief of Staff may indicate that he will be a highly partisan president, who will bully opponents into support for his plans. Then again, perhaps he will make up for Emanuel by appointing more moderate Democrats and possibly even Republicans to key positions in the cabinet.

Via Hot Air comes the additional news that word on the street has it that yet another liberal Democrat, John Kerry, may become Obama’s Secretary of State.

Is Obama on his way to create a highly partisan and quite liberal administration?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. c3
    November 6th, 2008 at 01:30
    Reply | Quote | #1

    We’ll see.

  2. Selin
    November 6th, 2008 at 14:54
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Yes, they can… Brainwash everyone into submission and bully the rest, that is… :)

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.