Robert Gibbs Will Be Obama’s Press Secretary

November 6th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Robert Gibbs, who played a key role in the election campaign of president-elect Barack Obama, will be the administration’s press secretary.

If true – our report from yesterday saying that Rahm Emanuel was reported to have accepted the job of Chief of Staff was denied later by Emanuel himself yet today the news came that he did indeed accept the offer, albeit not yesterday but today – this would once again be an indication that Obama’s administration may be less bipartisan, moderate, civil and honest than many moderates and centrists hoped.

Gibbs has, according to some, the reputation of a partisan hack, willing to do and say everything, as long as he and / or his boss win(s).

Reporters, most of whom were and still are passionately pro-Obama, will have less trouble with the announcement, however. The highly partisan and pro-Obama Politico, summarized the expected reaction of reporters as follows: “the announcement is likely to be viewed favorably by reporters because Gibbs has unquestioned authority, access and institutional memory.”

Whatever can be said about Gibbs, he is a ‘loyal’ Obama partisan above all. Although such people are certainly handy, one wonders whether Obama could not have asked a television personality with an image of moderation to be his press secretary, much like George W. Bush did with Tony Snow (a great press secretary indeed).

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. c3
    November 6th, 2008 at 23:07
    Reply | Quote | #1

    “he is a ‘loyal’ Obama partisan above all”
    Wasn’t Scott McClellan loyal guy also?

  2. Michael van der Galien
    November 6th, 2008 at 23:13
    Reply | Quote | #2

    yes, is that a compliment?

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.