The War on Palin

November 6th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Aides to Senator John McCain and his allies in the media, seem to have decided that the time has come to throw out all the dirty laundry they have on Governor Sarah Palin.

Yesterday, some news outlets reported that, when Palin had to speak with McCain aides about the strategy to be used, she welcomed them into her hotelroom wearing a bathrobe only.

Of course, quickly putting on a bathrobe because someone knocks the door when you’re just taking a shower (or just done taking one), is perfectly normal. The aides and allies in the press undoubtedly tried to present Palin as some kind of whore or hillbilly, but everyone in their right mind would come to the conclusion that if you cannot handle a woman in a bathrobe you may have a serious sex-shortage.

Not only that, but word came out yesterday that Randy Scheunemann, a well known name, was fired by McCain’s campaign manager Rick Davis last week because he would be guilty of ’siding with’ Palin. According to the McCain campaign, Scheunemann was the source in the McCain campaign last week who defended Palin and blamed other McCain aides for most of the problems created in the last two weeks of the campaign, including wardrobegate.

Later it was added that Gov. Palin did not know what countries were members of NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, or that Africa is a continent not a country. These rumors are so strange, it would require Palin to be so thoroughly uninformed that even a Palin critic such as myself has a hard time swallowing the rumor.

Palin herself reported to the rumors, gossip and smears by saying she did not want to play that dirty game afterwards and pointing out that one of the main problems these days seem to be that many take politics personal.

She also criticized the media, for she understands that one of the major reasons for her damage image was the bias of the media. “I want to make sure that Americans understand that there is a little bit of disappointment in my heart about the world of journalism today,” Palin told Fox News.

“I don’t want any individual journalist to take it personally,” she went on to say, “but I have such great respect for the role of the media in our democracy, it is a cornerstone, it allows for checks and balances. But only where there is fairness and objectivity in the reporting.”

She said she wants to help improve the media, with the help of her foundation – newly founded – which aims at “restoring credibility” in the media.

YouTube Preview Image

The reports of infighting and smears aimed at Palin are all part of a normal scene after a defeat. Most are undoubtedly lies, others may be true, again others may be exaggerations. However, the McCain aides who now leak all this information – real or made up – are taking a tremendous risk.

Whether they are happy with it or not, the conservative base loved and still loves Sarah Palin. They stuck with her after many weeks, two months even, of attacks in the media. The ‘leaks’ won’t cause them to change their mind. Rather, it may hurt those who leak this information and John McCain himself, for conservative bloggers have already declared war on the leakers.

The conservative blog Red State, for instance, announced the launch of a new project called “Operation Leper.” The goal of this operation is to identify the leakers, to “constantly remind the base about these people, monitor who they are working for, and, when 2012 rolls around, see which candidates hire them. Naturally then, you’ll see us go to war against those candidates.”

“It is,” the blog’s Erick Erickson goes on to write, “our expressed intention to make these few people political lepers.” Another conservative blogger, Patterico, ads: “The people responsible should be rooted out and should never be allowed to work for a campaign again.”

The war in the Republican Party will continue in the coming days. Fox News reported it would report the smears, leaks, etc. in the coming days. All smears will undoubtedly be aimed at Palin.

Those doing the leaking, however, should keep in mind that Palin is a hero to the base, which is willing to protect her against everyone, including those who worked for a badly mishandled campaign resulting in Republicans losing the White House. The dirt on Palin may, in the end, cost the leakers and the people they work for more than anyone else.

Rumor has it, that some of these staffers may be working for Governor Mitt Romney or at least hope he will run in 2012. That could be true. However, this is highly unlikely considering that the leaks are coming from McCain aides, with lots of personal knowledge about Palin and about how the campaign was handled. It is unlikely that aides to Romney heard about these rumors. Instead, it seems likely that these are Republican operatives taking revenge on Palin, trying to scapegoat her, in order to safe their career.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Rudi666
    November 6th, 2008 at 17:56
    Reply | Quote | #1

    LOL The Right is making “lepers” of the Palin critics. What if 50% of these stories are true, Palin as the future of the GOP is welcome by this Liebrul. Forget about serious thinkers like Flake,Portman and Jindal; go for the “Joe th plumber” crowd and fade into oblivion. The Democrats didn’t fix themselves by going left of McGovern…

  2. C Stanley
    November 6th, 2008 at 18:01
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Actually Rudi, the Dems did go left of McGovern on labor issues (card check bill) and they’re doing pretty well. ;-)

    All of the people you mention represent the future of the party. The big tent has room for some who are more socially conservative as well as the more libertarian type. Funny how so many are criticizing the party for not being a big enough tent, but they’re the same people who want to purge all socons.

  3. Grewgills
    November 6th, 2008 at 20:01
    Reply | Quote | #3

    “The conservative blog Red State, for instance, announced the launch of a new project called “Operation Leper.” The goal of this operation is to identify the leakers, to “constantly remind the base about these people, monitor who they are working for, and, when 2012 rolls around, see which candidates hire them. Naturally then, you’ll see us go to war against those candidates.”

    “It is,” the blog’s Erick Erickson goes on to write, “our expressed intention to make these few people political lepers.” Another conservative blogger, Patterico, ads: “The people responsible should be rooted out and should never be allowed to work for a campaign again.””

    Yet more evidence of descent into totalitarianism?

  4. faboofour
    November 6th, 2008 at 20:07
    Reply | Quote | #4

    You’re misquoting the media reports: Palin did not answer a door in a bathrobe. From Newsweek (the source) http://www.newsweek.com/id/167581/page/2 : “One night, Steve Schmidt and Mark Salter went to her hotel room to brief her. After a minute, Palin sailed into the room wearing nothing but a towel, with another on her wet hair.” (Emphasis mine.)

    One always makes one’s point better if one reports one’s facts accurately.

  5. marc
    November 6th, 2008 at 21:09
    Reply | Quote | #5

    @Grewgills, re “Yet more evidence of descent into totalitarianism?”, no. It’s an attempt to keep treacherous individuals out of positions of power and influence.

    McCain’s team lost the election because neither he nor they had nothing to offer the country. They had no strategy to combat Obama, no clear policy objectives, and no consistent campaign plan. Some of that’s on McCain, but the “playas” organizing the parade don’t want to accept blame for their part in the failure. Easier to flame Palin instead of accepting responsibility, which is rich given that their constraints on her led to a lot of the problems she had answering questions, as in, “What do they want me to say to keep up the united ticket line of bull?”

  6. icarus
    November 6th, 2008 at 22:17
    Reply | Quote | #6

    Actually, according to Newsweek (the source) she greeted her visitors wrapped in a towel, not a bathrobe. Apparently, $150K plus wasn’t enough money for her to buy a bathrobe too.

  7. You Betcha
    November 6th, 2008 at 23:05
    Reply | Quote | #7

    Sarah Palin – hero to the base?

    Should also be synonymous with “Hero to the Liberal Left”. Lol.

  8. Kill the messenger?
    November 7th, 2008 at 01:00
    Reply | Quote | #8

    Smoking out whistle blowers hidden in the shadows of McCain’s advisors potentially promotes greater catastrophes later on down the road.

    The Palin leaks sound like gross exaggerations, but what if they’re not? If you end up having a witch hunt to burn the heretics who sounded the alarms, it’s possible that Palin rises to power, her true ignorance and stupidity reappears, this time as the primary candidate to a national audience, and the Republican party has to wait til 2016 to try yet again.

    Well, I suppose, SNL will be worth watching once again. Don’t cha know?

  9. kritter
    November 7th, 2008 at 01:36
    Reply | Quote | #9

    McCain lost in part because he had no coherent message, but choosing Palin as his VP was also a serious miscalculation. 60% of respondents in an exit poll on Election Day pegged her as too green for the job, which is a damning statistic.

  10. Geoff
    November 7th, 2008 at 02:09

    So from what I gather, people were trying to find any reason in the world to trash Palin. It came down to a) she was a woman b) she didn’t murder her retarded baby c) she held views people didn’t like.

    So after that it came down to post hoc rationalizations.

  11. Michael Merritt
    November 7th, 2008 at 03:40

    Watching the Fox News report about some of these rumors, one thing becomes clear:

    Now even Fox News is becoming part of the liberal media.

    Or they could just have a bunch of Palin-hating partisans there. Take your pick.

  12. Interested
    November 7th, 2008 at 03:48

    I saw a report out on Fox News vs the others. in terms of what the networks spent covering Obama vs McCain.

    Most had Obama coverage in the million plus, and McCain about 300, 400k
    Fox News had Obama about 600K, McCain about 550K

  13. Interested
    November 7th, 2008 at 03:52

    kritter :
    McCain lost in part because he had no coherent message, but choosing Palin as his VP was also a serious miscalculation. 60% of respondents in an exit poll on Election Day pegged her as too green for the job, which is a damning statistic.

    Umm, No Kim. It was still the message. McCain camp let that message go by, and the Left tried everything possible to keep the same spotlight on Obama, who had more green than Palin did.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.