Axelrod to go to White House

November 7th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

David Axelrod, president-elect Barack Obama’s chief strategist, has agreed to go with his client to the White House, George Stephanopoulos reports.

Axelrod is what you could describe as Obama’s Karl Rove. He is a master campaigner and image builder. He helps politicians win elections. That, and nothing more, was and will remain his role.

He will, Stephanopoulos says, become Obama’s Senior Adviser in the White House.

The Politico reported about this possibility more than a week ago, arguing that bringing Axelrod with him may make a lot of sense for Obama, an image builder and strategist is always useful for a president, but also pointing out that the last person to use one specific strategist this often was George W. Bush, and the strategist’s name was Karl Rove.

Rove has according to many politicized the White House to an unprecedented degree. Many colleagues of Axelrod and Democratic advisers told Politico last month that they feared that Axelrod would politicize the White House as well, if only because he would draw the attention and focus of reporters and Republicans alike.

Not only does Axelrod remind people of Rove because of his profession, but also because of the central role he has played in the Obama campaign and the high degree of confidence Obama has in him. As Politico put it in the October 27 article linked to above, Axelrod is the only strategist having Obama’s ear. His words go unchallenged.

Nonetheless, it could very well be that Obama will surround himself by other strategists as well, who will give him a different take on it all, and it could also be that both Obama and Axelrod will purposefully try to keep ’small politics’ out of the White House.

Thus far, however, those who argue that Obama is not surrounding himself with the people a moderate (liberal) statesman would normally surround himself with could make a stronger case.

Nonetheless, Obama has only just begun building his team. Many other positions remain open, positions that could be filled by moderate, practical, and less ‘political’ individuals, or even by moderate Republicans.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.