Indiana: Obama Workers Want to Get Paid

November 7th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

It has to be said that this report over at the Indianapolis News Weather is quite ironic: 375 people who worked hard the last days of the campaign to convince voters to go vote for Sen. Barack Obama, protested before the campaign’s office in Indianapolis claiming the campaign had not paid them yet, and demanding to be paid instantly.

When the campaign finally acted, the protesters did indeed get some money, but much less than they were due. They were told to fill in a form; they would receive the rest of their salary in the mail.

“I want my money today! It’s my money. I want it right now!” yelled one former campaign worker.

Another one: “It should have been $480. It’s $230.”

And then another: “They gave us $10 an hour. So we added it. I added up all the hours so it was supposed to be at least $120. All I get is $90.”

Even more angry former campaign workers: “I worked nine hours a day for 4 days and got paid half of what I should have earned.”

“They say that they gonna call you or they going to mail it to you, but I don’t know. We’ll see what happens.”

The kicker: “Talking about they’ll mail it to us. I ain’t worried about that, man. They’re not going to mail nothin’.”

This is of course ironic because Obama has said he wants to raise taxes on “the rich” (which initially meant individuals making more than $200,000 a year, but that number was lowered to $150,000 by Sen. Joe Biden and to $120,000 by Gov. Bill Richardson, a key ally of president-elect Obama), which was celebrated by many of the same people now demanding the money they worked for as a ‘righteous’ plan, while conservatives and others who opposed the tax increases were accused of ’selfishness’ and ‘greed.’

At the same time, Obama has promised he will give a “tax credit” to people which means that they will have to fill in forms, which will then result in them receiving back some of the money the government took from them.

Of course, the protests and demands for immediate money could happen to any candidate, so we should not pretend that this is a typical Obama problem, etc., but it is highly ironic and as such entertaining; it gave me, at least, a good laugh.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Interested
    November 7th, 2008 at 04:53
    Reply | Quote | #1

    unless I missed something. I didn’t see anything in it that said the campaign promised to pay within x days.

    Unlike so many, I’m under no false illusions regarding how much I will pay in taxes under Obamaeconomics. But with this – what are the details, is it a simple case of miscommunication

  2. marc
    November 7th, 2008 at 05:58
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Actually it’s what we literary types call foreshadowing…

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.