Republican Leadership to be Replaced

November 7th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

After a party loses elections as big as the Republican Party did earlier this week, both for the White House and Congress, a bloodbath is likely to follow: leaders will have to be replaced, those directly responsible for the defeat will have to be held accountable. In politics, making people accountable means firing them or, more often, them resigning.

House Republican Whip Roy Blunt, who is the number two GOP leader in the House of Representatives, said on Thursday that this is indeed what he will do. He will not run for reelection. Instead, he will make room for a younger, quite talented Republican Congressman Eric Cantor.

Although these leaders should indeed resign, one wonders in how far Cantor is ‘innocent’: he was Blunt’s deputy, meaning that he was quite an influential Republican in Congress. The Republican Party lost 18 seats in the House, meaning that all leaders failed to live up to their responsibilities.

Then again, Cantor and his supporters will argue, the rise to the top normally takes time; replacing leaders with their deputies makes sense for the deputies know the ins and outs of the game, while completely outsiders of newcomers do not.

Furthermore, these individuals argue, Cantor is a greatly respected and talented conservative Congressman. As such, he is expected to do fine as one of the leaders of the new Republican Party, which has to be created after Tuesday’s massive defeat.

Meanwhile, Rep. Adam Putnam from Florida also announced he would step down as Republican conference chairman, which is the third-ranking job for Republicans in Congress. 

At this moment, only one high ranking Republican Congressman has said he wants to keep his job: Rep. John Boehner (from Ohio). 

Boehner made his case for the conservative Red State blog yesterday writing that he “tried to lead by personal example in the fight for smaller, more accountable government, and I sense that we now have our greatest chance in more than a decade to renew that fight together as a party.”

Perhaps logical, for Boehner, but it could very well be that conservative pundits, thinkers, bloggers and activists will call for his resignation nonetheless. Boehner was, in the end, the leader of the Republicans in the House of Representatives. The GOP lost 18 seats in the House during this week’s election. He was one of the main people responsible for the massive defeat. Calls for his resignation are likely to increase in the coming days, one wonders whether Boehner will be able to resist the pressure, especially considering the fact that there are quite some talented younger conservative Republicans who are looking forward to lead their party.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Bob A
    November 7th, 2008 at 04:23
    Reply | Quote | #1

    This is what makes the GOP the better party. They have the insight to police their own leadership and change it when needed. The Dems just ride it out with washed up radicals like Pelosi, Reid, Kennedy, Dean, Kerry, etc.. I don’t think the Dems had a descent leader since Tip O’Neill. Ok.. Tip was a bit radical too, but he was strong.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.