Ohio Agency Head Put on Paid Leave in Wurzelbacher Case

November 8th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Helen Jones-Kelley, director of the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services and former head of that department in Montgomery County, has been put on paid leave by Governor Ted Strickland of Ohio.

Jones-Kelley is suspected of having ordered a background check into Joe ‘the Plumber’ Wurzelbacher, the man who played a central role in the last weeks of the campaign after he asked president-elect Barack Obama whether his tax plan would mean he, Joe, would have to pay higher taxes.

“It’s not that I want to punish you for your success,” Obama answered, “it’s just that I, we believe that spreading the wealth around is good everybody.”

Obama’s answer was used by his critic as evidence of his Social Democratic tendencies, and Wurzelbacher was interviewed by many news channels such as CNN, MSNBC and Fox.

During the last presidential debate, Sen. John McCain used the exchange between Obama and Wurzelbacher to his advantage. He mentioned the plumber 20 times or so, in his attempt to convince voters that Obama would raise taxes on most of them before the end of his term in order to “spread the wealth around,” meaning giving money made by those who work to those who do not.

Immediately after the debate, reports were published everywhere that Wurzelbacher did not earn $200,000 or more – Obama said during the campaign that he would only raise taxes on individuals earning $200,000 or more and on businesses making $250,000 a year or more – and that he had yet to pay taxes over his income. He had a tax lien, reports said. Not only that, but “Joe the Plumber” did not even have a licence to plumb, media reported breathlessly.

It was clear that someone within the Ohio government had done an illegal background check on Wurzelbacher and shared this private and sensitive information with reporters. An investigation was launched which resulted in the decision of Gov. Strickland to send Jones-Kelley on a paid leave.

Meanwhile, Joe Wurzelbacher had become a hero to fiscal conservatives who feared that Obama would indeed try to spread the wealth around as president. He was a much praised figure in the conservative blogosphere. Some encouraged him to run for Congress, others said he may record a CD.

Wurzelbacher’s story is a strange one; the story of a normal plumber, who asked a presidential candidate to which that candidate gave an honest – and very telling answer – after which the plumber was destroyed by that candidate’s allies in the media and politics. It is the story of a man asking a heartfelt question, which resulted in a massive witch hunt and abuse of power seldom seen before in modern U.S. history.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.