Rahm Emanuel Under Fire: Tax Evasions and Freddie Mac Ties

November 8th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Shortly after Rahm Emanuel was reported to have accept president-elect Barack Obama’s offer to be his Chief of Staff in the White House, ABC News reported that Emanuel has close ties to Freddie Mac. Freddie Mac is the financial institution closely connected to the crisis in the financial markets – it contributed to the crisis to a very significant degree.

According to ABC News, Emanuel served on the board of directors of Mac at a time when the federal mortgage firm was under fire due to (financial) mismanagement.

‘According to a complaint later filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission, Freddie Mac, known formally as the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, misreported profits by billions of dollars in order to deceive investors between the years 2000 and 2002,’ ABC News reported.

Emanuel himself was not mentioned in the SEC complaint but the entire board was later accused by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) (click here to read) of having “failed in its duty to follow up on matters brought to its attention.”

The Orthodox Jew served on the board from 2000 to May 2001, when he resigned because he ran for Congress.

Reacting to the report at ABC News, a spokesman for Emanuel said that the latter only served on the board for 13 months and told his fellow directors that they should take Congress’ concerns into consideration.

Whatever the case, Emanuel’s ties to Freddie Mac will undoubtedly result in criticism from conservatives, moderates and members of the media. Already, conservative bloggers and activists are preparing to use Emanuel’s ties to Freddie Mac against both him and his future boss Barack Obama.

This is a very serious problem for Emanuel and for Obama. The latter presented himself as a ‘new’ voice, a new kind of politician. Emanuel’s ties to Freddie Mac may do much to help destroy the image Obama created for himself in the last two years, and especially in the last two months, by presenting himself as the only man able to deal with the current economic crisis.

At the same time, Democrats succeeded in blaming Republicans for the crisis. They, Democrats said, were the once who constantly pushed for deregulation and who let these financial institutions destroy the U.S. economy. The reports about Emanuel’s tries to Freddie Mac, however, could inform the public about something that was underreported during the campaign: Democrats were just as much, perhaps even more, to blame for the failure of financial institutions such as Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae as Republicans.

Emanuel’s ties to Freddie Mac could become especially problematic considering the fact that the company was accused of “illegally using corporate resources between 2000 and 2003 for 85 fundraisers that collected about $1.7 million for federal candidates.” If this issue is explored, and if Obama critics succeed in tying Emanuel closely to the failure of Freddie Mac and the culture of corruption, Obama’s image of an outside reformer who will clean up Washington D.C., will suffer before he even takes office.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Jimmie
    November 8th, 2008 at 02:33
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I don’t see it, Michael. Obama has much closer ties to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (Franklin Raines, Jim Johnson, the copious donationis he took over three years). No one, especially not the MSM, cared one bit. Indeed, one could barely hear the names of either GSE in MSM stories on the mortgage problem.

  2. Jay_C
    November 8th, 2008 at 04:24
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Is it me, or does everyone and their brother involved in this election year have ties to Freddie Mac? :)

  3. Jay_C
    November 8th, 2008 at 04:26
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Sorry, I’m not reducing the importance of the story, I just can’t beleive “the tangled web they weave” is all.

  4. paul
    November 8th, 2008 at 04:27
    Reply | Quote | #4

    The news media has to look at market makers and hedge funds as well as deregulation of the SEC brought about mostly on Republican watch. The Sec like the EPA was almost completely watered down during Bushs term.
    The telemarket industry and credit card industry and rules for energy companies were completely deregulated.

    @Jay_C

    @Jay_C

    @Jay_C

    @Jay_C

    @Jay_C

  5. Jay_C
    November 8th, 2008 at 04:49
    Reply | Quote | #5

    True Paul and the news media has to look at Equal housing lending rules like this one…
    “Encouraging banks and other lenders to use non-traditional methods for evaluating credit and loan amount terms, based on cultural differences and other individual factors” brought about mostly on the Democrat watch.

    So to me this says if I meet these critera, but can’t afford a loan, get creative and find a way banks! If you dont meet these critera, and can’t afford it, hit the road and save for a house like you are supposed to. Given our current fiscal crisis, I find it luicrous that these rules still in place!? Shouldn’t we be back to you can either afford a house, or you can’t?

    http://www.hud.gov/offices/fheo/promotingfh.cfm

  6. dale
    November 8th, 2008 at 05:49
    Reply | Quote | #6

    the republicans took the controls off both just like mccain did to the savings and loans. no regs, no money. it dissappears. so sorry, all gone, give me bonus and severance please, thank you…..what happened to my free medical for life, you rotten commoners. do you know who i am?

  7. daveinboca
    November 8th, 2008 at 06:42
    Reply | Quote | #7

    paul, those with long memories can remember that Jimmy Carter actually began deregulating way before Reagan & GHWB continued one of the only sensible policy changes JC effected during his disastrous four year tenure [during which he actually became less popular than GWB did in eight, an improbable feat---HST also was very unpopular, but his rep rebounded in hindsight, as GWB's might still do. James Earl C is moribund in the reputation department.] Carter demoted the Federal Power Commission down to FERC, and also took a few other Commissions off-line.

    About every prominent Dem had smudged his hands with the CRA and FanFred, but the media barely breathed a word, all the while Barney Frank’s “husband” had been on the board of directors with Tiny Rahm along with other RICO crime spree Dem operatives like J.Johnson, J.Gorelick, F.Raines, all pocketing immense bonuses for faked-bookwork “achieved goals” while the entire CRA and FanFred were edifices built on sand and loans made under duress by banks threatened with discriminatory investigations if homes weren’t sold to shiftless Dem constituents [sorry for the tautology].

  8. paul
    November 9th, 2008 at 03:44
    Reply | Quote | #8

    there is no doubt that whoever put those many deregulated rules in housing lending are equally to blame as the Sec not being there to regulate what was going on in the market place. I said this before why not have electronic trading and get rid of hedge funds? That would almost guarantee honest trading. As it is now, the cozy relationship insiders had with brokers and other market people almost made taking investors money a given. If they could take investors money they can give each other huge bonuses without any one caring. The SEC must make rules to empower the legitimate role of the market…not as a way for rich people to manipulate the market

  9. rjjrdq
    November 9th, 2008 at 04:06
    Reply | Quote | #9

    Did you really think you were getting change?

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.