Rahm Emanuel Under Fire: Tax Evasions and Freddie Mac Ties
Shortly after Rahm Emanuel was reported to have accept president-elect Barack Obama’s offer to be his Chief of Staff in the White House, ABC News reported that Emanuel has close ties to Freddie Mac. Freddie Mac is the financial institution closely connected to the crisis in the financial markets – it contributed to the crisis to a very significant degree.
According to ABC News, Emanuel served on the board of directors of Mac at a time when the federal mortgage firm was under fire due to (financial) mismanagement.
‘According to a complaint later filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission, Freddie Mac, known formally as the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, misreported profits by billions of dollars in order to deceive investors between the years 2000 and 2002,’ ABC News reported.
Emanuel himself was not mentioned in the SEC complaint but the entire board was later accused by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) (click here to read) of having “failed in its duty to follow up on matters brought to its attention.”
The Orthodox Jew served on the board from 2000 to May 2001, when he resigned because he ran for Congress.
Reacting to the report at ABC News, a spokesman for Emanuel said that the latter only served on the board for 13 months and told his fellow directors that they should take Congress’ concerns into consideration.
Whatever the case, Emanuel’s ties to Freddie Mac will undoubtedly result in criticism from conservatives, moderates and members of the media. Already, conservative bloggers and activists are preparing to use Emanuel’s ties to Freddie Mac against both him and his future boss Barack Obama.
This is a very serious problem for Emanuel and for Obama. The latter presented himself as a ‘new’ voice, a new kind of politician. Emanuel’s ties to Freddie Mac may do much to help destroy the image Obama created for himself in the last two years, and especially in the last two months, by presenting himself as the only man able to deal with the current economic crisis.
At the same time, Democrats succeeded in blaming Republicans for the crisis. They, Democrats said, were the once who constantly pushed for deregulation and who let these financial institutions destroy the U.S. economy. The reports about Emanuel’s tries to Freddie Mac, however, could inform the public about something that was underreported during the campaign: Democrats were just as much, perhaps even more, to blame for the failure of financial institutions such as Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae as Republicans.
Emanuel’s ties to Freddie Mac could become especially problematic considering the fact that the company was accused of “illegally using corporate resources between 2000 and 2003 for 85 fundraisers that collected about $1.7 million for federal candidates.” If this issue is explored, and if Obama critics succeed in tying Emanuel closely to the failure of Freddie Mac and the culture of corruption, Obama’s image of an outside reformer who will clean up Washington D.C., will suffer before he even takes office.










I don’t see it, Michael. Obama has much closer ties to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (Franklin Raines, Jim Johnson, the copious donationis he took over three years). No one, especially not the MSM, cared one bit. Indeed, one could barely hear the names of either GSE in MSM stories on the mortgage problem.
Is it me, or does everyone and their brother involved in this election year have ties to Freddie Mac?
Sorry, I’m not reducing the importance of the story, I just can’t beleive “the tangled web they weave” is all.
The news media has to look at market makers and hedge funds as well as deregulation of the SEC brought about mostly on Republican watch. The Sec like the EPA was almost completely watered down during Bushs term.
The telemarket industry and credit card industry and rules for energy companies were completely deregulated.
@Jay_C
@Jay_C
@Jay_C
@Jay_C
@Jay_C
True Paul and the news media has to look at Equal housing lending rules like this one…
“Encouraging banks and other lenders to use non-traditional methods for evaluating credit and loan amount terms, based on cultural differences and other individual factors” brought about mostly on the Democrat watch.
So to me this says if I meet these critera, but can’t afford a loan, get creative and find a way banks! If you dont meet these critera, and can’t afford it, hit the road and save for a house like you are supposed to. Given our current fiscal crisis, I find it luicrous that these rules still in place!? Shouldn’t we be back to you can either afford a house, or you can’t?
http://www.hud.gov/offices/fheo/promotingfh.cfm
the republicans took the controls off both just like mccain did to the savings and loans. no regs, no money. it dissappears. so sorry, all gone, give me bonus and severance please, thank you…..what happened to my free medical for life, you rotten commoners. do you know who i am?
paul, those with long memories can remember that Jimmy Carter actually began deregulating way before Reagan & GHWB continued one of the only sensible policy changes JC effected during his disastrous four year tenure [during which he actually became less popular than GWB did in eight, an improbable feat---HST also was very unpopular, but his rep rebounded in hindsight, as GWB's might still do. James Earl C is moribund in the reputation department.] Carter demoted the Federal Power Commission down to FERC, and also took a few other Commissions off-line.
About every prominent Dem had smudged his hands with the CRA and FanFred, but the media barely breathed a word, all the while Barney Frank’s “husband” had been on the board of directors with Tiny Rahm along with other RICO crime spree Dem operatives like J.Johnson, J.Gorelick, F.Raines, all pocketing immense bonuses for faked-bookwork “achieved goals” while the entire CRA and FanFred were edifices built on sand and loans made under duress by banks threatened with discriminatory investigations if homes weren’t sold to shiftless Dem constituents [sorry for the tautology].
there is no doubt that whoever put those many deregulated rules in housing lending are equally to blame as the Sec not being there to regulate what was going on in the market place. I said this before why not have electronic trading and get rid of hedge funds? That would almost guarantee honest trading. As it is now, the cozy relationship insiders had with brokers and other market people almost made taking investors money a given. If they could take investors money they can give each other huge bonuses without any one caring. The SEC must make rules to empower the legitimate role of the market…not as a way for rich people to manipulate the market
Did you really think you were getting change?