McCain Aides Come to Palin’s Rescue

November 9th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

It took them a while, but increasingly more aides to Sen. John McCain are coming to Governor Sarah Palin’s rescue.

Steve Biegun and spokesman Tracy Schmitt both told reporters on Sunday that the ones going after Palin are acting maliciously and spreading lies about her.

“I’m appalled by it because Sarah Palin was one of nicest people I have ever had the chance to work with,” said Biegun, a former Bush NSC aide. “I’ve worked in Washington for 20 years, on the Hill, in the White House and in the private sector, and she ranks at the highest levels of decency, kindness and graciousness of anybody I’ve ever worked with.”

Tracey Schmitt, the vice presidential nominee’s traveling spokeswoman and a veteran of the RNC and both Bush campaigns agreed saying: “Gov. Palin was a breath of fresh air, particularly for those of us who’ve been living in the Washington bubble. Because she is a working mom, she brought a real sense of perspective to the campaign trail, which was important.”

Taylor Griffin, a McCain press aide who had been focusing on economic issues until he was dispatched to Alaska in late August also weighed in: “One of the great developments of this campaign is the addition of Sarah Palin as a powerful and energetic new voice in American public life. She’s smart, insightful, and has an uncanny ability to ask the right questions.”

National Review’s Rich Lowry also spoke to Biegun who told him that “there’s no way she didn’t know Africa was a continent, and whoever is saying she didn’t must be distorting ‘a fumble of words.’ He talked to her about all manner of issues relating to Africa, from failed states to the Sudan. She was aware from the beginning of the conflict in Darfur, which is followed closely in evangelical churches, and was aware of Clinton’s AIDS initiative. That basically makes it impossible that she thought all of Africa was a country.”

About the NAFTA smear Biegun said: “Somebody is taking a conversation and twisting it maliciously.” He then explained that he was briefing her on a wide array of trade agreements, among which NAFTA, while other staffers walked in and out of the room. Palin was distracted and asked Biegun: “Ok, who’s in NAFTA, what’s the deal with CAFTA, what’s up the FTA?” Which was, according to Biegun, her way of saying “rack them and stack them,” begin again from the start. “Somebody is taking a conversation and twisting it maliciously.”

As said, it took McCain’s aides a while to come to Palin’s rescue, but it is good to see that they are finally going on record to debunk the smears which try to portray Palin as being more stupid and less informed than the average Labrador. The NAFTA and Africa rumors especially would only be believed by those suffering from a very serious case of Palin Derangement Syndrome.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. c3
    November 9th, 2008 at 07:49
    Reply | Quote | #3

    I’m still waiting for McCain himself to speak up. The wait is getting frustrating. It doesn’t seem “honorable”

  2. Mike
    November 9th, 2008 at 14:36
    Reply | Quote | #4

    While I also think it would be wise for McCain to come out and defend Palin, I wonder what he could possibly say that hasn’t already been said.

    He has continuously defended Palin’s intelligence during the campaign, and during his concession speech gave her many compliments as a politician and leader.

    Assuming that he wasn’t a direct witness to the conversations related to the latest accusations, what more could he say that isn’t just a repetition of what he’s already said?

    So while politically it makes sense for him to defend her once again, I think it’s a bit far to question his honor in not doing so, considering how far he’s gone to defend her from similar accusations in the past. McCain’s public comments on Palin have been clear.

  3. C Stanley
    November 9th, 2008 at 14:54
    Reply | Quote | #5

    My feelings are mixed on that- like c3, I’d like to hear McCain blast those who are acting like middle school kids spreading nasty gossip.

    On the other hand, I can see why it’s awkward- this would imply that he lost control of those within his campaign, and he risks damaging the reputations of some of his loyal staffers who did not engage in this smearing (because the leaks were anonymous, so his criticism would appear to affect all of them.)

    I got a hint of that from an interview Palin gave- she mentioned that she’d just spoken with McCain and that they were both expressing frustation over how to respond to anonymously sourced smears. It’s sort of a damned if you do, damned if you don’t thing.

  4. frankhagan.com » Palin Smears Revealed
    November 10th, 2008 at 18:05
    #6
Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.