Obama Prepares to Quickly Undo Bush Actions

November 9th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

President-elect Barack Obama’s transition team has been working for months on a plan to undo many of President George W. Bush’s actions without Obama having to consult with Congress. According to the New York Times, the team has made a list of approximately 200 items, which Obama could reverse immediately after taking office.

Of the 200 items, the most important ones are probably stem cell research executive orders and issues related to abortion.

With regards to stem cell research, Obama will enable the federal government to fund it immediately. Stem cell research is believed to enable scientists to find cures for diseases such as Parkinson’s and others that continue to ruin hundreds of thousands, even millions of lives. However, days-old human embryos are used for stem cell research which are destroyed in the process. Many conservative Christians oppose such research for that very reason. Bush agreed with them, signing an order that would prevent the federal government from funding it.

Obama may now undo that highly controversial move shortly or even immediately after taking office.

Also, the team has advised Obama to lift a so-called global gag rule, which bars international ‘family planning’ groups that receive U.S. funding to inform women about the availability of abortion.

Although Obama expects to work closely with Congress in the coming years, he also wants to bypass Congress when he can. He will be able to do so in order to ‘undo the damage,’ from his perspective, caused by Bush in the first days after taking office, by simply focusing on regulation and social issues. Which is exactly what he intends to do.

The above mentioned policy changes are probably supported en masse by the American people, although most certainly not by Republicans. They will be controversial in so far that the average Republican will not be happy with the changes, considering it to be part of the ‘culture war’ they have been fighting with liberals for decades now.

He will also almost immediately act against global warming, the Times report explains. He might even officially declare that carbon dioxide emissions are endangering human welfare, and he might ‘create a National Energy Council to coordinate all policymaking related to global climate change.’

Although many believe global warming to be real, and partially man-made, many also believe that jumping to conclusions and implementing policiies out of fear is unwise. Rather, the average person believes, leaders should look at the situation seriously, and come up with ways to limit the damage. However, the first move Obama will make in this regard is to let California and other states to determine their own strict rules for automakers. This would most likely be welcomed by liberals and moderates and perhaps even by conservatives who believe the government does not have the right to tell states what to do in this regard; Bush intervened only to help automakers, not out of ideological reasons.

And so, Obama will act immediately after taking office, thereby undoing many of Bush’s decisions. Bush’s legacy lives on though, in the Supreme Court and Iraq,

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Jules Crittenden » Obama Positioned
    November 9th, 2008 at 16:04
    #1
  2. Amphipolis
    November 10th, 2008 at 17:04
    Reply | Quote | #5

    The NYT editorialized last year that the Supreme Court should have two new justices. This could be quickly passed in a flurry of legislation.

  3. Interested
    November 10th, 2008 at 17:15
    Reply | Quote | #6

    well lets be honest about it. Is there one voting American alive today that thought the Democrats would not use Executive privileges – at the same time they bashed Bush for using his? Of course Obama will, and of Course the Dem’s will not only support it – they will defend it too. The Dem’s and hypocrisy go hand in hand and have done so for a long time.

    I personally, do not agree with the limiting fed funding for stem cell research and I cannot believe there is anyone who does not know abortions are legal – so what good is a gag order.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.