Republicans Focusing on 2012

November 9th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The Politico, which proved to be completely in the tank for now president-elect Barack Obama during the campaign, reports that the Republican Party is “gearing up for 2012.”

“Votes are still being counted in some races in last Tuesday’s election, but no matter: Talk of the potential Republican field in the 2012 presidential election is already underway,” the new media outlet’s Jonathan Martin writes.

“Two potential candidates will be in Iowa before month’s end, multiple prospects — almost certainly including Sarah Palin — will make high-profile appearances next week at the Republican Governors Association (RGA) meeting, and Newt Gingrich’s name has already been floated in a Bob Novak column.

“For a party anxious to move past a brutal election up and down the ballot, and especially a presidential campaign it would just as soon forget, it’s not too soon to start thinking about ‘next time,’ as the pros call it.”

Quite some Republican politicians publicly say they are not willing to even think about 2012, let alone talk about it. Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee said, for instance: “That’s way too far away.”

Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, agrees: “I’m going to tell you something. One of the worst things that can happen to the Republican Party in our effort to rebuild is for a bunch of people to start running for president. Anybody harboring that ambition needs to squelch it until after 2010. … Anybody out there running for president is undercutting what’s important. You do this against your own interest.”

But the fact of the matter is, of course, that Republicans everywhere are thinking about 2012. Names are already being floated around. Gingrich is considered an option by Novak. Sarah Palin is the darling of the (social) conservative base, and potential frontrunner for the party’s nomination in 2012. Mitt Romney too is often mentioned as likely future leader of the party that lost so many seats in Congress this month and the presidential election.

Huckabee is certainly a future option as well, of course. He was the Christian conservative’s base darling this year. Romney was his main opponent: Huckabee seemed to be OK with a John McCain victory, but he truly hated and despised Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, who was the favorite candidate of the fiscal conservative but social moderate or even liberal faction of the party.

Whoever turns out to be the party’s frontrunner in 2012, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal is also often mentioned as a man for the future, it is clear that Republicans are rightfully focusing on the future, wondering what man or woman can make their party victorious once again. The public talk about not thinking about 2012 is not more than that: talk. Everybody is looking towards 2012, and the most amibitious Republican politicians are positioning themselves for it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Politics « Capitalist View
    November 9th, 2008 at 22:57
    #1
  2. Robert
    November 10th, 2008 at 02:45
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I agree that 2012 talk is way too soon. I do like Jndal, Huckbaee, and Newt…all of them can think and communicate. I hope they advocate for some good government candidates in 2010.

  3. marc
    November 10th, 2008 at 05:52
    Reply | Quote | #3

    2012? Ugh. I don’t even want to hear the word “campaign” for two years, minimum.

  4. MK in Arizona
    November 10th, 2008 at 06:31
    Reply | Quote | #4

    I am so disappointed that Obama won that I want to already look to 2012 to give me some hope. That hope would be Mitt Romney! I think in four years everyone will realize that you need someone with intelligence and experience to run the country, not a celebrity like Obama or Palin. Mitt will be there to fill that void. Romney in 2012!

  5. c3
    November 10th, 2008 at 19:47
    Reply | Quote | #5

    MK;
    Mitt will have to decide which “Mitt” runs: The Republican governor of Massachusetts who managed to successfully govern a very blue state or “fire breathing” conservative who spoke at the Republican National Convention.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.