Steve Schmidt: Leaker-in-Chief Explains McCain Defeat

November 9th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Steve Schmidt, Chief Strategist of the McCain campaign, was interviewed by The Daily Best. In the interview, Schmidt explains why he believes they lost the election. He also speaks shortly about Governor Sarah Palin, mostly in defense of her, although it becomes clear that he is truly no fan of the politician from Alaska.

Most interesting about the interview is that Schmidt says he believed the battle to be lost in September, after the financial markets crashed. At that moment it was incredibly difficult if not impossible to come back from behind and to win the election, Schmidt says.

One wonders why this man remained in place, instead of stepping down at that moment. He tells The Daily Beast that both he and Sen. John McCain decided to fight on, seemingly with Schmidt believing the goal to be going down fighting and with honor. That is not a winning mentality; it indicates he should have resigned at that moment and let others who actually believed in the mission take over.

Schmidt also believes that the Republican Party will have to play catch up with the Democratic Party with regards to technology, and then especially the Intrnet. “The Democratic Party is a generation ahead technologically. And the Republican Party is going to have to be competitive to catch up in a world where viral information is just as important as what might be in the network news,” he says.

Although Schmidt is certainly right about that, it is fascinating to see that this man was in charge of the McCain campaign. No one else was. And if this campaign failed in one regard, it was on the Internet; the Internet was used horrible, there was little to no outreach to bloggers, the website was little more than a collection of advertisements and campaign slogans, with no way for visitors to participate in the campaign, and to feel a part of Team McCain.

Schmidt was responsible for that, no one else.

He did have some interesting things to say about the need for the Republican Party to reach out to African Americans and Latinos: for too long have Democrats been allowed to dominate these two groups. The monopoly on the black vote is likely to continue in the coming years, for as long as Barack Obama is president. Nonetheless, Republicans should do everything in their power to peel off some black support for the Democratic Party in general – you could start by having them support a Republican member for Congress – and there is enough room to do something about the Hispanic vote. Hispanics are cultural conservatives and religious. There is certainly a lot of room to compete for their vote, which will be essential in the coming years and especially decades.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.