Telegraph Accuses Sarah Palin of Obama Threats

November 9th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The British newspaper the Daily Telegraph, seemingly in the need of higher sales and more online hits, published an article today entitled “Sarah Palin blamed by the U.S. secret service over death threats against Barack Obama.”

The actual content of the article says no such thing, nor does it quote the secret service as saying it: instead, the only thing that they noticed is that more people threatened president-elect Barack Obama at about the same time Governor Sarah Palin started accusing Obama of “palling around with terrorists,” and having other unsaviory friends.

But the secret service does not blame her for the death threats in any way. Instead, it could very well be argued that more threats were made in the last month to 1.5 months of the campaign, simply because the wackos started paying more attention to the campaign at that point and because Obama haters then started to realize that Obama could actually win the election.

It was a sad day when the first serious newspaper felt it had to use a screaming headline in order to sell more copies, regardless of the actual content of the story and the truth.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Michael Merritt
    November 9th, 2008 at 21:50
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Is the Telegraph not a conservative-leaning publication?

  2. Michael van der Galien
    November 9th, 2008 at 22:10
    Reply | Quote | #2

    MM: yes it is.

    PT: it’s one of the best newspapers out there.

  3. Michael Merritt
    November 9th, 2008 at 22:24
    Reply | Quote | #3

    The reason I asked is that you would think they’d be more friendly to her for that reason. Guess not.

    Money is apparently more important than honesty.

  4. Michael van der Galien
    November 10th, 2008 at 00:17
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Money is apparently more important than honesty.

    Exactly my point. And money tends to trump ideology

  5. Erika S
    November 12th, 2008 at 01:34
    Reply | Quote | #5

    It’s Newsweek blaming Palin, not the Secret Service. And note that the Newsweek article says the spike was in September and early October. That doesn’t correspond to Palin’s tougher remarks and liberal media accounts of her rallies becoming “frenzied.” As far as I know, it all started with an October 6 rally which the Washington Post reported on: “In Fla., Palin Goes for the Rough Stuff as Audience
    Boos Obama.” That was the story that reported someone yelled “kill him” apparently about Ayers which was twisted in other accounts into being about Obama. Also check out this Newsweek article: “The Secret Service and the Obama Death Threat.” It says the Secret Service was angered by Obama spreading the false report that people had yelled “kill him” about him at Palin rallies when he’d been told that in the two known possible incidents, neither turned out to be the case.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.