CBS Reporter Investigated for Looting

November 10th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Jules Crittenden reports that federal agents are investigating whether CBS correspondent Lara Logan smuggled mementoes to the U.S.

Agents found out that Logan had items in her possession which belong back in Iraq, after a video profile on the beautiful reporter was aired called “Lara Logan’s Spoils of War.”

In the video, Logan shows off mementoes from Iraq and Afghanistan which she keeps in her Washington office. She explained she found the pieces in the ruins of the Olympic committee building after it was bombed by American forces.

A U.S. law, which aims at protesting Iraqis’ heritage considers such actions theft.

As Jules points out in a couple of times in his post on it, Logan is one of the most beautiful and ambitious female reporters in America. The case could hurt her image considerably, considering the unprofessional nature of the act; a reporter reports. Not steal.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Selin
    November 11th, 2008 at 19:09
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Actually what damaged America’s reputation abroad was also about the kind of looting that happened in the aftermath of war. I’ve heard quite a few people of Middle Eastern background mention this. It is one thing to go to war, even if it’s for oil, even bomb places and kill civilians in the name of “collateral damage”, but another thing to rip off national treasures and steal artifacts like she has done. The looting and stealing without any respect for the culture is a major factor in why US has lost so much credibility as well. These are not trophies or “goodies” for anyone to take home. It’s a hideous act, an utter disrespect for the culture and the inheritance.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.