Nancy Pelosi’s Delusions and the Obama Presidency

November 10th, 2008 By: marc moore | Tags:

Nancy Pelosi says that voters must not have understood what they were voting for in regard to Proposition 8.  The San Franciso Chronicle reports that the Democratic Speaker of the House recently displayed an almost John Murtha-like condescension toward California voters after they voted to ban gay marriages in the state.  What does this mean, if anything, for hopes of a moderate Obama presidency?

The Chronicle:

Pelosi said she believes some voters might not have fully understood the initiative, which overturned a state Supreme Court ruling legalizing same-sex marriage.

“Unfortunately, I think people thought they were making a statement about what their view of same-sex marriage was,” the San Francisco Democrat said. “I don’t know if it was clear that this meant that we are amending the Constitution to diminish freedom in our state.”

That’s highly unlikely, to the point of being delusional.  Pelosi has evidently forgotten the sequence of events – California voters’ definition of marriage as being between a man and a woman and the state Supreme Court’s ruling that rejected that definition – that led up to the passing of Proposition 8. 

Contrary to Pelosi’s statements, California voters have made their position clear.  It’s also clear that Nancy Pelosi is more liberal than voters in the most left-leaning state in the union.

That’s why it’s so important for Barack Obama to bring Ms. Pelosi to heel and control the Democrats’ political agenda during his presidency. 

John Fund says that Rahm Emanuel will help make sure that Obama’s Congress won’t make the same blunder of lurching to the left as was done during Bill Clinton’s first term:

Mr. Emanuel has a reputation as a tough partisan, but he has also exhibited impatience with left-wing members of his party who have overly ambitious ideological agendas. A likely first assignment for Mr. Emanuel will be reminding House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid that, after only two years of Democratic control, Congress already has a lower approval rating than even President Bush’s.

Indeed, Nancy Pelosi herself has gone on record as saying that the nation must be governed from the center.

“The country must be governed from the middle,” Pelosi, D-Calif., told reporters Wednesday. “You have to bring people together to reach consensus on solutions that are sustainable and acceptable to the American people.”

That’s certainly true.  Unfortunately, her subsequent statements, like the one insulting voters for approving Prop. 8, indicate that she doesn’t realize where the center actually is. 

On one hand, that will be a constant problem for Mr. Obama if allowed to go unchecked.  On the other, perhaps his relationship with Pelosi will serve as a sort of litmus test about his strength and governing style.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Michael Merritt
    November 10th, 2008 at 06:17
    Reply | Quote | #1

    He does have to get tough with Congress, that’s for sure.

  2. Interested
    November 10th, 2008 at 08:31
    Reply | Quote | #2

    it’d be wonderful if Pelosi & Reid went to management classes.

    Maybe if Congress worked really really hard – they could leap upwards and get Bush’s approval ratings.

    But I wouldn’t hold my breath

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.