An Obama Holiday

November 11th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

There is actually a movement that wants to create a new American national holiday: Barack Obama day. The activists believe that Barack Obama’s victory in the presidential election was of such historic proportions, as were his accomplishments, that it warrants a brand new holiday in its and his honor.

Although some may say that there is credence to the idea that a national holiday should be created for the first victory of an African American in a presidential election, it seems a bit … early.

He isn’t even in the White House yet. He hasn’t accomplished anything except for being elected. That is a great accomplishment, of course, but the real work starts now. We don’t know what kind of president he will be; if he will leave office with approval ratings similar to George W. Bush, well, the Obama holiday will be a national day of mourning and lost chances instead.

The best way forward is moderation, not exaggerated responses to Obama’s historic victory.

If the same movement exists 20 years from now, and Obama is still popular, then is the time for a debate about the matter. Not now.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Claudia, Assistant Editor
    November 11th, 2008 at 23:00
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Uhh, Michael Merrit already posted about this, no?

    http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/10/topeka-obama-supporters-to-promote-obama-holiday/

    It seems to be a rather small group that’s advocating this. In any event I’m with one TMV blogger, that’s what we have Presidents Day for.

    I recognize the symbolic victory for African Americans, but I don’t see it as any more historic than the passage of the Civil Rights Act.

    Unless Obama not only saves the country from the brink of another Great Depression but also gives everyone healthcare, eliminates poverty and gets rid of used-car salesmen, I don’t see why he should get his own holiday.

  2. Michael
    November 12th, 2008 at 00:48
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Excuse me but isn’t all this celebration getting a “little” out of hand? He ran a “good” election, meaning that his team presented a “better” product than the Republicans but come on. Getting elected is the easy part, running the country and keeping it safe and prosperous (not that he has any more control of that over the congress than any previous President) hasn’t been demonstrated yet. All the flowery speeches and the psuedo promises won’t cut it when tackling the real problems he’ll face next year. Let’s just hope that this relatively unknown isn’t another Jimmy Carter who also was tossed out as the savior of the country by the Democratic party when there was an anyone but a Republican focus for the president in the 1975 elections.

  3. Michael van der Galien
    November 12th, 2008 at 00:57
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Uhh, Michael Merrit already posted about this, no?

    Which means I can’t write about it?

  4. Claudia, Assistant Editor
    November 12th, 2008 at 01:22
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Of course not, but since the conclusion was so similar I assumed you might not have seen it.

    I think that most rational people, even ardent Obama supporters, see this as ridiculous.

  5. Michael Merritt
    November 12th, 2008 at 03:32
    Reply | Quote | #5

    Michael was also far less sarcastic about it all than I was. I personally don’t see a circumstance where Obama would ever get a holiday, given that the last president to get one was Lincoln.

  6. Michael van der Galien
    November 12th, 2008 at 11:39
    Reply | Quote | #6

    Michael: I don’t know. I think 20 years from now, we could speak about it again. And perhaps then we’ll conclude it was so important, it deserves a holiday. But not now. The man hasn’t done anything yet.

  7. Monica
    November 13th, 2008 at 08:23
    Reply | Quote | #7

    I heard he is only the sixth biracial president. What is the truth? Anybody’s dad could have come from Africa, if his white mother decided to sleep with him. I don’t see the ’specialness’ of anything historic here???

  8. Rudi666
    November 14th, 2008 at 08:09
    Reply | Quote | #8

    Yes lets bring up the Mandingo BS. Those ni%%%% want to sleep with our white virgin daughters.

  9. Jim
    December 4th, 2008 at 07:12
    Reply | Quote | #9

    Only the star struck, un/ill informed who have already elivated this entity to iconic status in their lives would even conceive of such foolishness. When our greatest President, George Washington, doesn’t have a day in his honor. giving such reverence to someone of the charactor of this man is a abomination.

  10. Jim
    December 4th, 2008 at 07:24

    And by the way for those who think this man might be the Antichrist, he is not. However, He’s very significally prototypical. Very charismatic, world reknowned and a symbol of hope. He is not by any means a man of God. To compare him to Martin Luther King, as many do, is inane.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.