I.O.U.S.A. the Movie

November 11th, 2008 By: marc moore | Tags:

To the extent that a slap in the face is ever something to seek out, the free, 30-minute version of I.O.U.S.A the Movie is a must-see.  One excerpt has David Walker, Controller General of the United States, saying our current standard of living is unsustainable.  Walker:

We suffer from a fiscal cancer it is growing within us.  If we do not treat it it could have catastrophic consequences for our country.”

My review after the jump.

Our national debt of $8.7T is bad enough but our unfunded promises are at least $53T, a number that’s getting worse by $2T annually.

It’s worth noting that the Founding Father’s took on debt to win independence.  Smartly they paid it back.  In 1835 there was no federal debt.  The Civil War’s expenditures were also largely paid off.  In 1913, the national debt was only 7% of GDP vs. today’s 64%.  It’s worth noting that the federal income tax passed that year, something that by historical standards should have brought prosperity to the government’s budget.

That didn’t happen.  The spending spree of the 1960s led to economic stagnation in the 1970s and the Reagan and Bush 41 administrations sent the national debt up from $900B to $4T.

Bill Clinton and Robert Rubin balance the budget for the first time in a generation, despite what Rubin calls a “natural inertia” toward the expansion of federal programs, “most of which are very useful.”

Clinton concentrated on balancing the budget instead of cutting taxes and he’s famous for having done so.  But even Clinton’s so-called surpluses were that in name only.  Why?  Because Social Security surpluses were spent for other purposes.  When baby boomers retire, even this surplus will not exist to meet promises made to them.

The big 3 governmental obligations – Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security – are going to expand faster than we can increase their funding. 

Personal debt problems make the federal budgetary problem worse.  In both of the last 2 years we as individuals, like the federal government, spent more than we earned.  This last happened in 1932/1933 – not a good time for America.  In the 21st century, personal savings are unheard of, having actually gone negative from more than 12% in the 1960s.

Former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan says,  “Without savings there is no future.”

If that’s true America has no future; we’re actually losing money every year.

One cause is our trade deficit.  The U.S. has the largest trade imbalance in the world, whereas China has the largest surplus.  The Chinese produce, in other words, while we consume.  To continue this trend we will have to liquidate our assets.  Eventually our trading partners will own large chunks of the U.S., as the Japanese were starting to do in the 1990s before their economy tanked.

Interestingly, the U.S.’s budget deficits used to be owned to Americans.  Remember war bonds?  But now more than half of our debt is owned by foreigners.  As the U.S. demonstrated to England in the 1950s, control over debt can equal control over U.S. actions.

The problem is one of leadership.  George Bush 43 started his administration $5.6T in the hole.  Now we’re at $8.7T, bringing the Republicans’ post-Carter deficit to a total of $6.2T. 

Former U.S. Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill says he was fired because he didn’t believe in Bush’s economic policies and because he didn’t support the 2003 tax cuts.  He says he was told not to worry about deficits.  But O’Neill notes that when countries get overextended and can’t service their debt, they are finished.

As bad as our debt problem is, that’s not the worst of America’s financial picture.  As unpleasant as it is for social liberals to accept, it’s our future obligations in the form of social insurance entitlements that are a gun to our head. 

Our $53T budgetary shortfall breaks down like this:

  • $11T – current obligations
  • $26T – MediCare A and B
  • $8T – MediCare D
  • $7T – Social Security

Offsetting dollars?  Zero.  In fact, taxes would have to be doubled to meet these obligations.  The problem is worse by far than even Democrats will admit.  Cutting out all earmarks, rolling back the Bush tax cuts, and stopping funding of the Iraq war would solve only 14% of the problem.

Small wonder that the American people want change.  Most don’t understand the fundamental problems or their part in creating it, yet they understand at a visceral level that something has been wrong with our leadership.

We now have new leadership that promises to make the changes needed.  They’ve been outlined above.  Let’s see how Barack Obama does at correctly identifying the problems, articulating them to the American people, and marshalling Congress to address them.  It’s a huge challenge for any president, let alone one whose experience is minimal.

At the risk of alienating the non-Christian set, I’d suggest praying for him and his staff.  I know I’d appreciate it if I were in his shoes.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Rachel
    November 11th, 2008 at 17:37
    Reply | Quote | #2

    UK peeps…the full film is release in cinemas over here from this weekend…

    LIVERPOOL – Picturehouse at FACT – Saturday 15th 3.00pm
    NEWCASTLE – Tyneside Cinema – Saturday 15th 3.55pm
    BRIXTON – Ritzy – Sunday 16th 2.00pm
    EXETER – Picturehouse – Sunday 16th 2.00pm
    CLAPHAM – Picturehouse – Monday 17th 6.30pm
    EDINBURGH – Cameo – Monday 17th 7.00pm
    NORWICH – Cinema City – Monday 17th 8.30pm
    BATH – The Little Theatre Cinema – Monday 17th 6.15pm
    ABERDEEN – Belmont Picturehouse – Monday 17th 6.30pm
    GREENWICH – Picturehouse – Monday 17th 6.30pm
    SOUTHAMPTON – Harbour Lights Picturehouse – Monday 17th 6.45pm
    YORK – City Screen Picturehouse – Tuesday 18th 6.30pm
    HENLEY – Regal Picturehouse – Wednesday 19th 8.30pm
    OXFORD – Phoenix Picturehouse – Wednesday 19th 6.30pm
    LEEDS – Hyde Park Picture House – Thursday 20th 6.45pm
    IOUSA UK dates on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=34060233339&ref=mf

  2. Jay_C
    November 12th, 2008 at 15:47
    Reply | Quote | #3

    “One cause is our trade deficit. The U.S. has the largest trade imbalance in the world, whereas China has the largest surplus”

    Yeah, how’s that “global economy” working for the U.S.A? My wife and I were looking at some toys were were going to buy for Christmas presents. They were all US companines (Fisher-Price, etc.)NOT ONE was made in the US…I should say, ALL of them were made in China. Not this specific example, but in general this is a known trend. See for yourself when you go the mall. So to me, the country that makes the “stuff” gets the money. I see a clear 1 to 1 correlation here. Not sure how it can be seen any other way. The chickens have come home ot roost on this in my opinion.

    Also, I still have to see the movie, as you said, we basically already know this issue was preventable, is our own fault, and is not a failure of capitalism.. but we may need to rub salt in this wound for us to wake up and get back on the right track.

  3. Dan
    November 13th, 2008 at 20:18
    Reply | Quote | #4

    It’s refreshing to see a documentary with actual facts compiled by actual professionals….not just some fat guy from Hollywood with his own agenda :)

    See my review of I.O.U.S.A here:

    http://bankvibe.com/

  4. Matt Sherman
    November 13th, 2008 at 22:13
    Reply | Quote | #5

    This movie is really good at scaring you. Some of the projections are absolutely bone-chilling. But it largely overstates the problem — the deficit is currently at a manageable level of 3% of GDP. And we need to run a deficit in this economic downturn to ensure we don’t have skyrocketing rates of unemployment. The flim also ignores one of the best solutions to the “problem” — health care reform. If our health care system were as efficient as other industrialized nations, and if Medicare/Medicaid were able to take advantage of these lower costs, then our deficit problem would basically disappear. Check out the Center for Economic and Policy Research, they have a nice graphic that demonstrates this well: http://www.cepr.net/calculators/iousadeficit/calc_iousa_deficit.html

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.