Obama Spokesman: Obama Ready to Rule On Day One

November 11th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The co-chair of Barack Obama’s Transition Team, Valerie Jarrett, told MSNBC’s Tom Brokaw on “Meet the Press” this last Sunday that the president-elect was working closely with George W. Bush in order to make the transition between the two administrations run as smooth as possible so that he, Obama, would be ready to “rule on day one.”

Although some conservative pundits have used Jarrett’s words in order to defend allegations uttered by some Republicans that Obama is a Marxist hell bent on becoming America’s first dictator, it seems to me that it was a reasonably innocent mistake by the Obama spokesman. We all sometimes use our words in a less careful manner than we would like to, as she clearly did this time.

Nonetheless, the words you use tell us something about who you are, and what you think. Jarrett does, seemingly, think in such terms. Not only about Obama, but about presidents in general.

Sadly for Jarrett, conservative commentators are right when they point out that a president does not “rule.” He governs. He is not a monarch. Monarchs rule, presidents govern.

In the United States, as in every other liberal democracy, the people are supposed to “rule.” Not elected officials.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Michael Merritt
    November 12th, 2008 at 03:34
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Liberals used the dictator argument for Bush, too.

    It’s as ridiculous a charge now as it was then.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.