<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama to &#8220;Bail Out&#8221; Unemployed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/11/obama-to-bail-out-unemployed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/11/obama-to-bail-out-unemployed/</link>
	<description>Because Common Sense Transcends Distance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:55:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Interested</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/11/obama-to-bail-out-unemployed/comment-page-1/#comment-78157</link>
		<dc:creator>Interested</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=9130#comment-78157</guid>
		<description>I agree Mike, but for different reasons, it&#039;s not really the government that is paying it - it&#039;s business.  Business pays most unemployment benefits to the State - and a much lower percent to the Federal Gov&#039;t.

For example, for the past 20 odd years, various employers I have worked for have paid unemployment for me in various capacities I have worked in.  Getting laid off during the Clinton Administration I applied for unemployment, but never submitted for a check.  So I never used it.  All that my employers paid in unemployment benefits for me went to someone else.  It&#039;s a typical Socialist program.

Now, to add insult to injury (for business) - if I were to file claim now - the employer ends up paying a higher rate for a few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Mike, but for different reasons, it&#8217;s not really the government that is paying it &#8211; it&#8217;s business.  Business pays most unemployment benefits to the State &#8211; and a much lower percent to the Federal Gov&#8217;t.</p>
<p>For example, for the past 20 odd years, various employers I have worked for have paid unemployment for me in various capacities I have worked in.  Getting laid off during the Clinton Administration I applied for unemployment, but never submitted for a check.  So I never used it.  All that my employers paid in unemployment benefits for me went to someone else.  It&#8217;s a typical Socialist program.</p>
<p>Now, to add insult to injury (for business) &#8211; if I were to file claim now &#8211; the employer ends up paying a higher rate for a few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/11/obama-to-bail-out-unemployed/comment-page-1/#comment-78139</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=9130#comment-78139</guid>
		<description>I realize this is purely anecdotal, but I thought I should share:

I know someone who recently lost her job, but who&#039;s husband makes enough to support them.  She applied for unemployment and got it for 6 months as long as she applies to two jobs per week.  She wasn&#039;t in a hurry to get a new job.  In fact, she said that she had some job applications ready, but she was holding onto them because she had already met her quota for the week.  She&#039;s perfectly happy taking the unemployment check while she does some freelance work on the side (apparently that&#039;s totally legal) and waits for a good opportunity to come along.  And I don&#039;t blame her.

When I think of that story, I can&#039;t help but think there&#039;s something wrong with our unemployment system.  I&#039;m not opposed to expanding the benefits to people who really need it during hard economic times, but when you&#039;re giving the benefit to people who don&#039;t need it, or giving people so much that there is no motivation to get a job, there&#039;s a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize this is purely anecdotal, but I thought I should share:</p>
<p>I know someone who recently lost her job, but who&#8217;s husband makes enough to support them.  She applied for unemployment and got it for 6 months as long as she applies to two jobs per week.  She wasn&#8217;t in a hurry to get a new job.  In fact, she said that she had some job applications ready, but she was holding onto them because she had already met her quota for the week.  She&#8217;s perfectly happy taking the unemployment check while she does some freelance work on the side (apparently that&#8217;s totally legal) and waits for a good opportunity to come along.  And I don&#8217;t blame her.</p>
<p>When I think of that story, I can&#8217;t help but think there&#8217;s something wrong with our unemployment system.  I&#8217;m not opposed to expanding the benefits to people who really need it during hard economic times, but when you&#8217;re giving the benefit to people who don&#8217;t need it, or giving people so much that there is no motivation to get a job, there&#8217;s a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/11/obama-to-bail-out-unemployed/comment-page-1/#comment-78129</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=9130#comment-78129</guid>
		<description>For those that are looking for jobs, About.com just added 3 new employment sites to their top 10 job site list:

www.linkedin.com (networking)
www.indeed.com (aggregated lists)
www.realmatch.com (matches you to jobs)

Whole Top 10 list here:
http://jobsearch.about.com/od/joblistings/tp/jobbanks.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those that are looking for jobs, About.com just added 3 new employment sites to their top 10 job site list:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.linkedin.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.linkedin.com</a> (networking)<br />
<a href="http://www.indeed.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.indeed.com</a> (aggregated lists)<br />
<a href="http://www.realmatch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.realmatch.com</a> (matches you to jobs)</p>
<p>Whole Top 10 list here:<br />
<a href="http://jobsearch.about.com/od/joblistings/tp/jobbanks.htm" rel="nofollow">http://jobsearch.about.com/od/joblistings/tp/jobbanks.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Merritt</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/11/obama-to-bail-out-unemployed/comment-page-1/#comment-78116</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Merritt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=9130#comment-78116</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t envy any president in this position.  On one hand, you have to decide whether to let a huge company fail and make employees mad at you, or do you save it and risk inflation or raising taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t envy any president in this position.  On one hand, you have to decide whether to let a huge company fail and make employees mad at you, or do you save it and risk inflation or raising taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
