Obama Leans Toward Asking Gates To Stay in Place for 1 Year

November 12th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

President-elect Barack Obama is considering asking current United States Secretary of Defense Robert Gates to stay on for at least another year, the Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday.

Two Obama advisers told the WSJ that Obama believes it would be best if Gates stays on due to the wars in Afghanistan and especially Iraq. A senior Pentagon official added that Gates would most likely accept the offer if proposed.

Obama is not the only one seemingly contemplating asking Gates to stay on for a while. Senator Harry Reid, the Democrats’ majority leader in the Senate, said recently that he believes Gates could stay on, and that Gates would be welcome in a Democratic administration because “he’s never been a registered Republican,” which indicates that if he was Reid may have thought differently.

Meanwhile, Gates himself may agree to the responsibility, but whether he will is far from clear. According to those in the know, the secretary of defense carries a keychain with him whose display shows the number of days until the end of the Bush administration.

Needless to say, the above indicates that Gates may not be looking forward to more years as secretary of defense.

Nonetheless, keeping Gates on would be a wise decision for Obama. Gates has proved to be an excellent secretary of defense, much better than his predecessor Donald Rumsfeld. He has overseen a successful surge in Iraq, and seems to have great contact with leaders of the United States military.

One thing: if Gates stays on, it would indicate that Obama may rescind on his promise to withdraw troops from Iraq in 2010. Gates is adamantly opposed to such a clear timetable. He additionally believes that more U.S. troops should be sent to Afghanistan, in order to crush the Taliban. If Obama keeps Gates on, it could very well be a sign that Obama’s view on Iraq has changed and that he will deal more practical with the Middle East and especially Iraq than he said he would during the campaign.

A good sign for moderates and conservatives, a bad sign for liberal doves who want the U.S. to withdraw sooner rather than later.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Orson Buggeigh
    November 12th, 2008 at 02:53
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Gates might be a good pick. In the long run, I think it is President Obama’s best interest to really be a uniter, rather than a divider, though that is not what his most faithful supporters on the left want to hear. But the reality is that he has a very slender mandate, much as most presidents have. He will need to govern from the center. One way to do that is to have several Republicans in the cabinet. Gates for now is a good start.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.