Hillary as Secretary of State
According to several reports in American media, Senator Hillary Clinton could very well become the Secretary of State in the Obama administration which will take office in January 2009.
Team Obama was considering asking individuals like Sen. Chuck Hagel, Sen. John Kerry or Gov. Bill Richardson for the job but, media report say, the leaders of the transition were not too happy with those choices.
Clinton would strategically be a very strong choice for president-elect Barack Obama indeed: It would help him heal the party tremendously. Furthermore, although Clinton lost she is still one of the most powerful Democratic leaders with a tremendous political machine operating for her. If Obama can tie her to himself, she will obviously help him for years from now.
Not only that, but Clinton is also a widely respected figure in the rest of the world. Until Obama proved he was a serious candidate for his party’s nomination, Clinton was the favorite abroad, especially in Europe. People remember her husband’s administration fondly. If you want to restore America’s reputation among its allies, Clinton would be a very good choice for Secretary of State indeed.
This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.
Comments are closed.
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
Hmmm Clinton is most certainly qualified, and is certainly tough enough to carry on such a role, but I’ll admit to some issues with this. From a political standpoint you’re absolutely right; the best way to ensure Clinton does not try to undermine you is to tie her success to yours. From the policy standpoint I see it as more iffy. One of the main differences between Clinton and Obama in the primaries was foreign policy (domestically they were almost identical) and Clinton’s favorite subject when she became the harshest on Obama was foreign policy. I can’t help but wonder about the ability of a woman of Clinton’s character to enact the philosophy of her boss instead of her own.
I think I could see it both ways. Richardson appeals to me. He is much more in line with Obama on matters of foreign policy and is also very qualified. On the other hand he strikes me more of a yes-man. I do like the “team of rivals” Lincoln philosophy that seems to attract Obama so much. In that sense Clinton is better, the ultimate rival.
Hagel would also be acceptable, and it would be a great bipartisan gesture. Kerry….I just can’t see it.
Hellp me understand how Hillary Clinton is qualified for Sec. of State. Clearly she has many skills but I haven’t seen them as extraordinary in foreign policy. There are many more qualified folks in the Democratic Party for Sec. of State.
Claudia: He’s thinking about keeping Gates, who has at least some differences in views on foreign policy than him. In light of that, I don’t think Clinton is a stretch if you’re talking about views alone.
if Hillary becomes the Sec. State, hopefully she will not be excessively distracted by outside drama or career plans, etc.
Barack Obama’s decision to offer Hillary Clinton the Secretary of State post could well turn out to be his first major blunder, for these obvious reasons:
First, there’s the inseparable bond with her husband Bill. Given the duo’s unquenchable thirst for power, they would not be content to play second fiddle. From day one they would be scheming to usurp control of the White House. Once they get a foothold, Obama would be hard-pressed to rein them in.
Then, there’s the Clintons’ long history of corruption, deception and sleaze—Whitewatergate, Pardongate, Cattle-futuresgate, Chinagate, Filegate, Fellatiogate, the impeachment and near conviction, the punitive IRS audits, the violent deaths of potentially incriminating witness. This alone would provide Obama’s enemies with all the grime they needed to smear his presidency.
Consider further that unlike a Condoleezza Rice or a Madelaine Albright—not to mention bona fide statesmen like Henry Kissinger, Dean Rusk and John Foster Dulles–Hillary Clinton lacks the educational and cultural gravitas to represent our nation abroad. Her lawyering in Arkansas and stint in Congress doesn’t quite cut it. She did get 18 million votes in the Democratic primaries, probably more than Obama, but a large proportion of those votes were cast by diehard feminists and the less educated, hardly the constituency whose support lends credibility to a Secretary of State.
Barack Obama should recall the reasons why he didn’t choose Hillary as his VP running mate. For his and the nation’s sake, let us hope that she doesn’t accept his Secretary of State offer.