It’s RINO Season!

November 14th, 2008 By: Michael Merritt | Tags:

Following up some of what we saw during the general election, and happening concurrently with arguments from some on the left that Joe Lieberman should be kicked out of the Democratic caucus, some on the right are calling for “Republicans in Name Only” of the John McCain variety (and “worse”) to be kicked out of the Republican Party.

I haven’t yet seen a stronger case for such a thing than from rocker Ted Nugent.  Nugent argues that it is time for more partisanship, not consensus building and reaching across the aisle.

RINOs reach across Fedzilla’s aisle to cut deals and build consensus with the liberals. Consensus building means compromising values and cutting deals with the socialist prankster punksters whose goal it is to turn America into EuroAmerica.

Consensus building is for wimps and soulless people who stand for nothing. Compromise is not about being tolerant: these days, it’s about giving up conservative principles.

Nugent also makes some suggestions as to whom he thinks would be a good pack of leaders for this new partisanized Republican Party:

Conservative leaders and thinkers such as Newt Gingrich, Jed Babbin, Governor Jindal of Louisiana, Thomas Sowell, Glenn Beck, Michelle Malkin, Governor Sarah Palin and others need to turn up the heat and bring this less government, more individual freedom and strong national defense revolution to a boil. It is time.

Out of the list, I definitely like Gingrich’s “all of the above” approach to energy (though it’s not exclusive to him).  Beck also occasionally has some good ideas, too.  Then he includes Michelle Malkin.  I suppose if Republicans want one of the lead ODSers of the blogosphere to head up their party, then okay.  Palin might be able to make a comeback, but she needs to develop an actual platform first.  And I don’t know much about the rest, including Jindal.

I can see why conservatives would want to stick to the principles on the issues, but consensus making and working across the aisle are not a sin, of course.  If everybody took Nugent’s advice, nothing would ever get done.

I know most Republicans probably aren’t actually taking such advice seriously.  But, I think it’s safe to assume that Ted Nugent is one who wouldn’t be particularly happy to have Lieberman caucusing with the Republicans.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Jay_C
    November 14th, 2008 at 15:36
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Well, After all Ted Nugent is a Rocker. His nature is to get folks riled up and attack this as only a rocker can… But sticking to ones principles, and convincing others why your principles are not the wrong ones and or are the right ones is something I believe in. I too like Gingrich and Beck’s Ideas. I wouldn’t call it more partisanship, but rather a media / grass roots campaign to make the case to the American people that don’t already believe this to be true of the Republican party anymore (and rightfully so)… that smaller government, lower taxes, supporting the military, more individual freedom, balancing the budget, a low (lowest possible) deficit and strong national defense are goals that we should strive for as a country, and the Republican party is the one that can take us there. Many are asking “What is the future of the Republican Party?” The real question should be, “Where is our country heading?” There’s no doubt that a large majority of Americans believe we’re on the wrong track. That’s why the candidate demanding “change” won the election. It mattered not that the change offered was no change at all in my opinion, only a change in who is running us into the ground. After eight years of war, attacks on our privacy, runaway deficits, and now nationalization of the financial system, Republicans are going to have a tough time regaining the confidence of the American people. But that’s what must be done.

  2. c3
    November 14th, 2008 at 19:22
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Pretty soon it will be a “pup tent” (The better to keep each other warm against the harsh, cold world out there!)

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.