Michael Steele for RNC Chair

November 14th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Michael Steele announced on confirmed his decision with Chris Cillizza, Hot Air reports, after which he appeared on Hannity & Colmes to discuss it.

If the Republican Party wants to become more inclusive, if it wants to be able to win over centrists and moderates, if it wants to convince minorities that they too are welcome in the party, if it wants to show that it understands the lesson of this year’s election, it would be very wise to choose Steele as its new leader.

Steele embraces and believes in conservative principles, both on a ‘gut-level’ and on an intellectual level. He is articulate and able to represent himself and his party very well. I agree with what Sean Hannity said on the show (watch the video below) that Steele is “the person for the job” who has “the passion” a candidate for the RNC needs.

Newt Gingrich is a valued intellectual conservative but he is not a new voice, nor will he be a new leader if he would become the chair of the RNC. Gingrich was what the Republican Party needed in the early and mid 1990s. It is now 2008. Get Steele in there, let him help reform the party, and bring it back to greatness.

YouTube Preview Image
Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.