The Return of the Clintonistas

November 14th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

As reported earlier, rumor has it that president-elect Barack Obama is considering asking Sen. Hillary Clinton to be his secretary of state. According to insiders, Team Obama is not particularly impressed by the traditional candidates for the position – Senators Chuck Hagel and John Kerry and Governor Bill Richardson for instance – and has decided to expand the scope of potential candidates for top positions in an Obama administration.

It is well known that Clinton and Obama could not get along during the primaries and that Obama did not want to ask the former First Lady to be his running mate. Nonetheless, the victory seems to have encouraged Team Obama to heal the intra-party wounds caused by the primaries and the team realizes that Clinton and their allies and supporters are those who know how to run a country.

Which has led to even more signals that Team Obama is considering lining up with Clinton and Clintonistas: Politico reports that many former Clinton officials are now working for Obama, are expected to work for him, or are being considered for top positions in an Obama administration. As Politico puts it, “Obama gets the Clinton band back together.”

Although the incorporations of ‘Clintonistas’ into Team Obama may cause some to wonder what Change Obama was talking about during the campaign season, the fact of the matter is that if you want to run a smooth administration, and especially a smooth first 100 days which are considered crucial for any new president, you need to surround yourself by people who have experience running the most powerful country on earth. Getting a completely new crew in will cause trouble in the first couple of months, simply because they don’t know how the White House works.

If you are a Democrat, there are only two things you can do in this situation: go back to Carter and his officials, or to the Clintons and their officials. Since Carter’s presidency is not believed to be very successful whereas Bill Clinton remains one of the most popular former presidents in modern history the choice is made quite easily.

Additionally, one assumes that the decision of Obama to incorporate so many former Clinton officials into his administration is a sign that he may be a more moderate president than some center-right critics of Obama during the campaign feared. Clinton was a Democrat, but he did not govern like an ideological liberal. His presidency was partisan, but not highly ideological; he governed like a pragmatist.

If Obama does so as well, chances are that criticism from moderates and center-right pundits will be reasonably limited, which should position quite well for a second term.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Michael Merritt
    November 15th, 2008 at 04:58
    Reply | Quote | #1

    There is a danger of course of using too many old hands in your administration. This was often a criticism of George Bush. So Obama would still do well to find some fresh faces.

  2. Interested
    November 15th, 2008 at 09:55
    Reply | Quote | #2

    yeah he certainly should – there are plenty of new Democrats to be moved up the ranks. I wouldn’t necessarily be against HRC being Sec state. If anything it would be an improvement of the current political situation. And it would give us one less Clinton in elected Gov’t.

    That’s good.

    And being under Obama, HRC’s self-serving attitude would only be given so much rope.

    Although I’d be at loss to see what possible positive it would be for her. She’d be too old to run in 8 years and the Senate seat gives her more opportunities – if she were to be a chair of a committee.

    Richardson would be my personal choice, he’s smart and has more experience than any other Democrat alive.

  3. Rudi666
    November 15th, 2008 at 19:44
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Int- The powers that be are blocking Billary from any Senate leadership. A successful run as SoS would help her legacy, while a mediocre run as a junior Senator from New York won’t get her many statues.

  4. Jay_C
    November 20th, 2008 at 15:46
    Reply | Quote | #4

    …President-elect Barack Obama promised the voters change, but he has started his Cabinet selection process by naming several Washington insiders to top posts….Once again, the media and many others fell prey to the “change message”.
    Actually, I take that back, I guess there will be change…. Clinton’s old team will be there for the most part, and rather than Clinton being president, Obama will be president, presto-CHANGE-o….so he didn’t lie… ;) sorry, just couldn’t resist.

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h2qtj24vzZZS2Jid8I03W0bz7zXwD94ILOPG0

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.