Hillary or Richardson

November 15th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

One day after we reported that Sen. Hillary Clinton was in the running for Secretary of State in an Obama administration it has become clear that there are only two candidates left standing for the job: Clinton and Governor Bill Richardson.

Richardson is an experienced diplomat. He worked for Bill Clinton as Ambassador to the United Nations in the 1990s, for instance. Clinton, meanwhile, may have less direct foreign policy experience, but she is a well known and well respected figure around the world who has interacted with foreign leaders during the eight years her husband was president.

Many foreign leaders, especially here in Europe, respect Hillary Clinton tremendously. She was seen as the next president of America, and most were looking forward to that prospect. If she would now become SoS most European leaders would be delighted.

At the same time, leaders of enemy states will be less than happy. Iran, for instance, favored president-elect Barack Obama over Clinton because Obama was considered a dove, whereas Clinton has a reputation for being a realist hawk. If Clinton would become Obama’s Secretary of State Obama would send a message to countries like Iran that he is not as dovish as they may have hoped.

However, the question is not what Obama would get out of Clinton as SoS. It is clear that it would be quite beneficial for him. No, the real question is why would Clinton accept? Can’t she be more influencial in the Senate? If she becomes SoS, she will lose her Senate seat and probably never get it back. That would be a risky move for her.

True, but there is only so much one can do in the Senate. It is unlikely, it seems to me, that she will succeed in becoming majority leader, so she will have to be happy with being chair of a committee. Nice. But it is only a committee. If she wants to have a real, big impact, and function as an example to other ambitious women, she should accept the offer and travel around the world to protect America’s interests.

Career prospects in the U.S. Senate are limited for Clinton. Becoming SoS will boost her image, reputation, experience and, of course, set her up for a role as leader of the party, outside or inside Washington D.C., after an Obama administration, much like Madeleine Albright is now.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.