Obama Resigns from Senate

November 17th, 2008 By: Michael Merritt | Tags:

As I’m sure everyone knows by now, President-elect Barack Obama resigned his Senate seat effective today.  Resigning a seat before becoming president isn’t entirely unusual, though most incoming presidents usually wait at least until the lame duck session is over before doing it.  The last sitting Senator to do it, John F. Kennedy, resigned on December 22, 1960.  His resignation of November 16th makes him the first person have done it so early.

It isn’t the biggest gap between one seat of power and the next.  Presidents-elect who were governors before the inaguration date was changed to January 20th by the 20th amendment sometimes had a three-month gap, but that’s because their term as governor had ended.

So, with a relatively important lame duck session coming up, one that might decide the future of several major auto manufacturers, why resign now?  There could be some reasons to do so.

First of all, Obama must select the rest of his White House team, as well as Cabinet positions and any other sub-Cabinet positions that a president-elect fills.  By returning to Washington, he risks making the Clinton blunder of appointing these positions late in the game, which would cause bumps in a so-far relatively smooth transition.  Obama doesn’t need that, so in that respect, it makes sense just to stay out of things.  He’s already expressed his support for any auto-bailout bill.

Second of all, any leg-work isn’t done in Obama’s former committees, anyway.  So what’s the point of going back when you won’t be doing anything?  Senator John McCain also won’t be in Washington for at least Monday, since he’ll be talking with Obama in Chicago.

The obvious problem comes if a bill does reach the floor of the Senate.  With Obama’s resignation and his successor not yet in place, the already razor thin majority the Democrats enjoy with the support of Lieberman and Sanders comes down to 50-49.  Obama would only be one more voice, but if one more vote is what it takes to pass the bill, well, a vote is a vote.  They could have used his help on this one

Yet, the Republicans are dead set against the bailout, and I personally don’t think the strings the Democrats have attached to a bill mandating more fuel efficiency and development for alternative-tech cars will pass muster with the Republicans, even if they can be corraled into voting to send money to the auto makers.  That bill is in the House, so I don’t know whether Reid is considering something similar or not.  But if he is, good luck in passing it.

Perhaps Obama thinks the bill won’t pass, and will wait until he’s in office before pushing for a similar bill.  Maybe.

But, I think he should have waited until at least December 1st, when the bailout issue was likely to be behind them one way or another.  After all, he’d still have a month and 20 days to make his Cabinet choices.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.