Obama Looking Increasingly Centrist

November 20th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

With about only 60 days left until inauguration day I am becoming increasingly hopeful that Barack Obama will govern like Bill Clinton did; as quite a centrist rather than a leftist Democrat.

Not only has Obama started to surround himself by (former) Clintonistas, which is a hopeful sign indeed, it seems likely that Hillary Clinton herself will become his Secretary of State.

Clinton is much more hawkish that Obama. She is a staunch supporter of Israel, supported the war in Iraq, and seems determined not to let Iran develop nuclear weapons. Obama seems a different kind of politician himself, but it is highly unlikely that Clinton would be willing to work for an administration which she would deem overly dovish.

Then there is Secretary of Defense Robert Gates; a true, old school Republican realist. President George W. Bush chose Gates as his SecDef after the horrendous and highly authoritarian Donald Rumsfeld resigned. Unlike his predecessor, Gates was able to communicate and work well with the State department, military leaders and foreign politicians such as Nouri al-Maliki. Gen. David Petraeus is often credited with turning the tide in Iraq but Gates’ role in the process should not be ignored; he too played a major role in bringing the different factions in the Middle Eastern country together.

As if that is not enough, Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano (D) has been chosen to head the Department of Homeland Security. Napolitano is a Democrat, of course, but she does well with Independent and moderate voters. She is a hard worker and a pragmatist rather than an ideologue. When the illegal immigration problem became prominent Napolitano did not focus on the illegal immigrants themselves but on the institutions that allowed foreigners to move so easily into the U.S. illegally. Conservative immigration hawks may not like her too much, deeming her soft on illegal immigration, but the rest can certainly live with her.

Since Napolitano is only 50 years old, she will turn 51 November 29, she may very well be her party’s presidential frontrunner in 2016, if Barack Obama performs well as president, serves two terms and does not become an albatross around the neck of fellow Democrats like George Bush became for Republicans. She is only 50 years old, but cannot run for governor again due to term limits. She could run for Senate, by taking over Sen. John McCain’s seat in 2012 when he is expected to retire, but becoming part of Obama’s administration would make even more sense for a woman with her experience, especially if she believes that Obama will serve two terms and retire with high approval ratings.

Whatever the future holds for Napolitano one gets the impression that President Obama will govern from the center (or relatively so). And that is good news for all of us, especially for those who feared that Obama would govern like he legislated in Senate; from the far left.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. c3
    November 21st, 2008 at 00:21
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I’m from AZ and voted for McCain and Napolitano. Yes she’s a moderate/centrist. However:

    “Since Napolitano is only 50 years old, she will turn 51 November 29, she may very well be her party’s presidential frontrunner in 2016″

    Uhhh… not to sound too controversial but that would be our first “L”-word president.

    Oh yeah and McCain is up for re-election in 2010.

  2. Claudia, Assistant Editor
    November 21st, 2008 at 00:56
    Reply | Quote | #2

    It’s a fact of life that any person that stays persistently unmarried in politics is going to have gay rumors surrounding them. Condoleeza Rice has had the same problem. Not that it makes a bit of difference to me what her sexual orientation is, though I would not anticipate with glee the sheer level of unadulterated bigotry that would be directed at her in the event of a presidential run. Being elected would also be amusing if she were gay and partnered. Can you imagine the sheer insanity of a woman being president but not being allowed to marry the first lady? Still, that’s 8 years away, hopefully (some) things will have changed by then. It could even be that a politicians sex life becomes irrelevant in terms of how apt they are considered for a post.

    OK, must sleep now, I’m clearly delusional.

  3. c3
    November 21st, 2008 at 21:00
    Reply | Quote | #3

    FYI Claudia. I’ve seen no stories or even stories with innuendos regarding a “close friend”. when I’ve had conversations with a variety of folks in AZ about Janet, if the subject turns to sexuality the comment is usually “Oh yeah, she’s gay..” and then it moves on. And such conversations have been with folks of all political stripes.

    Its not been a big issue in AZ (surprising for a state that passed an anti-gay marriage amendment). We’ve had a male gay US congressman (Jim Kolbe), openly gay mayor of Tempe (Neil Giuliano) etc.

    And who knows, maybe the “common knowledge” is wrong. She’s still been a good governor.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.