<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Republican Base&#8217;s Candidates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/23/the-republican-bases-candidates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/23/the-republican-bases-candidates/</link>
	<description>Because Common Sense Transcends Distance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:21:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/23/the-republican-bases-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-79588</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 22:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/23/the-republican-bases-candidates/#comment-79588</guid>
		<description>Former Republican congressional candidate Dean Scontras is right when he says that &quot;...the Republican Party must reaffirm its commitment to the &quot;three-legged stool&quot; of fiscal restraint, national security and social conservatism.&quot;  Unlike some would affirm (Tim Pawlenty, et al.), the Republican Party does not need to &quot;restructure&quot;, but rather &quot;return&quot; to its roots. 

These Gallup results demonstrate that Republican voters are going to make certain a return takes place in 2012.

&quot;Constitution Conscious&quot;
http://constitution-conscious.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Republican congressional candidate Dean Scontras is right when he says that &#8220;&#8230;the Republican Party must reaffirm its commitment to the &#8220;three-legged stool&#8221; of fiscal restraint, national security and social conservatism.&#8221;  Unlike some would affirm (Tim Pawlenty, et al.), the Republican Party does not need to &#8220;restructure&#8221;, but rather &#8220;return&#8221; to its roots. </p>
<p>These Gallup results demonstrate that Republican voters are going to make certain a return takes place in 2012.</p>
<p>&#8220;Constitution Conscious&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://constitution-conscious.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://constitution-conscious.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/23/the-republican-bases-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-79583</link>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/23/the-republican-bases-candidates/#comment-79583</guid>
		<description>We certainly don&#039;t want to kick anyone out.  There is a question of how far one can go to reach out to the middle while still being true to core principles.  In 2008, independents&#039; response was reflexive, as you say.  But that doesn&#039;t mean that Republicans have to accept abortion-on-demand as a platform blank, for instance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We certainly don&#8217;t want to kick anyone out.  There is a question of how far one can go to reach out to the middle while still being true to core principles.  In 2008, independents&#8217; response was reflexive, as you say.  But that doesn&#8217;t mean that Republicans have to accept abortion-on-demand as a platform blank, for instance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c3</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/23/the-republican-bases-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-79567</link>
		<dc:creator>c3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/2008/11/23/the-republican-bases-candidates/#comment-79567</guid>
		<description>The &quot;big tent&quot; is an issue for Republicans of all stripes.  Is it getting smaller?  And if it is can we afford to &quot;kick anyone out&quot;?

I would suggest the Republican tent is getting smaller along ethnic lines (i.e. Blacks and Hispanics).  You don&#039;t want folks saying &quot;reflexively&quot;:  &quot;Well of course I&#039;m a Democrat!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;big tent&#8221; is an issue for Republicans of all stripes.  Is it getting smaller?  And if it is can we afford to &#8220;kick anyone out&#8221;?</p>
<p>I would suggest the Republican tent is getting smaller along ethnic lines (i.e. Blacks and Hispanics).  You don&#8217;t want folks saying &#8220;reflexively&#8221;:  &#8220;Well of course I&#8217;m a Democrat!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
