<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Auto Bailout Appears More Likely</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poligazette.com/2008/12/03/auto-bailout-appears-more-likely/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/12/03/auto-bailout-appears-more-likely/</link>
	<description>Because Common Sense Transcends Distance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:33:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mobitronia</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/12/03/auto-bailout-appears-more-likely/comment-page-1/#comment-85546</link>
		<dc:creator>mobitronia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=9462#comment-85546</guid>
		<description>indeed these three automakers need any financial assistance and support all the way to make greener cars for the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>indeed these three automakers need any financial assistance and support all the way to make greener cars for the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason, Managing Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/12/03/auto-bailout-appears-more-likely/comment-page-1/#comment-80335</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason, Managing Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=9462#comment-80335</guid>
		<description>I am pretty sure that your plan would violate WTO and NAFTA treaty commitments that have been signed by the President of the United States, ratified by the Senate, and are therefore the &quot;supreme law of the land&quot; IAW Article II of the United States Constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am pretty sure that your plan would violate WTO and NAFTA treaty commitments that have been signed by the President of the United States, ratified by the Senate, and are therefore the &#8220;supreme law of the land&#8221; IAW Article II of the United States Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ppaw</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2008/12/03/auto-bailout-appears-more-likely/comment-page-1/#comment-80333</link>
		<dc:creator>ppaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=9462#comment-80333</guid>
		<description>AUTO BAILOUT OPTION

Please consider this option for the auto bailout.  This will make Congress look like heroes to the American taxpayers and help the auto manufactures.

The auto manufactures would be able to sell 2.5 million vehicles which would keep people employed and the taxpayers would get a benefit from the bailout money which came out of their paid in taxes.

Instead of just giving the auto manufactures $34 billion dollars for a bailout, give each person who filed an income tax last year and made less than $100,000.00, a government voucher for $20,000.00 to be used toward the purchase of a new American made vehicle.  

I’m not sure exactly how many people would fall in this category but the figures could be adjusted. Vouchers could be only good for the original holder and the car dealers would have to verify with the federal government that the voucher presented to them was truly sent to the person trying to use it and the vehicle would be titled in that name.  

The $20,000.00 cap would keep sales targeted toward the smaller, more energy efficient models.

It is a win-win situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AUTO BAILOUT OPTION</p>
<p>Please consider this option for the auto bailout.  This will make Congress look like heroes to the American taxpayers and help the auto manufactures.</p>
<p>The auto manufactures would be able to sell 2.5 million vehicles which would keep people employed and the taxpayers would get a benefit from the bailout money which came out of their paid in taxes.</p>
<p>Instead of just giving the auto manufactures $34 billion dollars for a bailout, give each person who filed an income tax last year and made less than $100,000.00, a government voucher for $20,000.00 to be used toward the purchase of a new American made vehicle.  </p>
<p>I’m not sure exactly how many people would fall in this category but the figures could be adjusted. Vouchers could be only good for the original holder and the car dealers would have to verify with the federal government that the voucher presented to them was truly sent to the person trying to use it and the vehicle would be titled in that name.  </p>
<p>The $20,000.00 cap would keep sales targeted toward the smaller, more energy efficient models.</p>
<p>It is a win-win situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
