Bill O’Reilly to End Radio Show

December 6th, 2008 By: Michael Merritt | Tags:

The Fox News host of “The O’Reilly Factor,” Bill O’Reilly, will end his syndicated radio talk show early next year, according to a report by Businessweek.

Apparently O’Reilly is trying to bite off more than he can chew:

In a statement, O’Reilly said the workload has become too much, adding, “I can no longer give both TV and radio the time they deserve.”

In an interview with the New York Daily News, O’Reilly explained further the workload he’s been facing and some of the other reasons for quitting the show:

“The media business is getting more and more intense,” O’Reilly said Thursday. “We’ve got to keep the TV show at the level we have it now, and that means more and more time to keep it competitive and fresh. I’ve been working 60, 65 hours a week and I just can’t keep doing that.”

I’m not sure that O’Reilly has much to worry about, given his ratings, but I can understand the need to spend more time doing one thing.

Although my own experience producing television hasn’t been “in the real world” per se, my work was aired to at least two towns, if not more.  But that doesn’t mean I can’t understand something of what he faces.  Not only did I produce a show, I edited episodes of that show, all while shooting and producing news packages for our weekly newscast, and sometimes more than one at a time.  All that while juggling college and some semblence of a social life.  Yes, sometimes is was a little overwhelming.  Yet, O’Reilly produces two shows five days a week.  So I can understand why he wants to focus on only one of them.

Still, with the already conservative domination of talk radio, losing O’Reilly will be win for the ideological purists.  O’Reilly says he aimed to limit that with his radio show, and I believe him:

He said he also found that radio listeners don’t just want a host who preaches their viewpoint.

“I knew my show couldn’t be ideological,” he said. “Going up against [Rush] Limbaugh, that would be suicidal. Why would a listener who’s already got Rush turn to someone else to hear the same things?

“So I was doing a show that was fact-based. It was more news/talk. And we were very competitive. In some cities, like Boston and St. Louis, we beat Limbaugh outright.”

I know O’Reilly is not a friend of the far right.  They loathe him because he won’t demonize anyone they consider a liberal (which is pretty much everyone to them).  Unlike what a lot of liberals believe, O’Reilly does not hold views that are so conservative as to be insane.  I think he does feel comfortable with many conservative positions, but he has some that are very non-conservative.  He can be loud and sometimes a jerk, but to mistake that for being a member of the far right is wrong.  From what I’ve seen, O’Reilly does mostly give things a fair shake, and that’s a good thing.

So, losing someone like O’Reilly on talk radio will give the ideologues that much more power.  He’s got to do what’s best for him, of course, but it is a bit of a pity that he has to leave.

I suppose it if makes his TV show all the better, it’ll be worth it.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. c3
    December 6th, 2008 at 16:39
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I can’t stand O’Reilly. Ideology aside he is all about “O’Reilly”. He badgers and belittles. Unfortunately, my wife likes to watch him. She can actually fall asleep to him. Oh well.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.