PC Librarians Ban Christmas at UNC

December 6th, 2008 By: marc moore | Tags:

What could be more American than a Christmas tree in December?  Apple pie in July, perhaps.  But politically correct librarians and at least one mid-level bureaucrat in administration at the University of North Carolina don’t seem to think that Christmas is something to celebrate and have banned the university’s decades-old tradition of displaying Christmas trees in the school’s libraries.  Can the Grinch have infiltrated UNC’s upper management?  Seems no one there has a heart, be it ever so tiny.

The Charlotte Observer:

The trees, which have stood in the lobby areas of Wilson and Davis libraries each December, were kept in storage this year at the behest of Sarah Michalak, the associate provost for university libraries.

Aside from the fact that a UNC Chapel Hill library is a public facility, Michalak said, libraries are places where information from all corners of the world and all belief systems is offered without judgment. Displaying one particular religion’s symbols is antithetical to that philosophy, she said.

“We strive in our collection to have a wide variety of ideas,” she said. “It doesn’t seem right to celebrate one particular set of customs.”

It doesn’t?  What if those customs are what built the country that your school resides in?  What if those customs form the core of what is quite frankly one of only a handful of nations in the world worth living in?  And what if those quaint, discardable customs created the Constitution that grants you the freedom to denigrate the beliefs of the overwhelming majority of your countrymen and deny them the right to affirm their faith as their forefathers – and yours – did?

A few years ago I worked at a company where the president personally gave me a little white towel emblazoned with an image that epitomized the organization’s philosophy. 

“If you ever hear someone in this company spouting a line of bullshit I expect you to throw down this towel and call them out on it immediately,” he said in his cool Australian twang and gave me a wink and a slap on the back so that I would know he meant it.

nobullshit

It’s unfortunate he’s not in leadership at UNC, because someone with a little courage and a little authority there needs to call bullshit on the overly politically correct, mean-spirited, anti-Christian, anti-American librarians, tell them to shush, and pull the Christmas decorations out of storage ASAP.

What an embarrassment to the university, its students, and to the state of North Carolina.  If I were the president of UNC – and I wish to God I was – I’d have Ms. Michalak’s letter of resignation on my desk by Monday morning.

In the proper frame of reference, Michalak’s ideas about accommodating a wide variety of ideas on campus are wonderful.  But not at the expense of compromising American traditions and American’s freedom to worship as we always have.

Does anyone in authority at UNC have the guts to say, “Enough of this nonsense.  We do things a certain way in America and that includes celebrating Christmas in our homes, on our streets, and in our businesses and schools.  I will personally make sure that we will continue to do so as long as my watch continues.”

Anyone?

Anyone at all?

(Crickets chirping…)

The Observer’s poll of nearly 8000 readers shows that 96% of North Carolinians say that public libraries should host Christmas displays during the season.  96%.  That’s a pretty convincing indication of what local citizens want, don’t you think?

If you’re in the 4%, I’m sorry to have to be the one tell you this.  But like I said a while back, common sense and common courtesy both dictate that you should put your right to use legal force on ice and look the other way for a couple of weeks while 96% of your fellow Americans celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ. 

God knows we have to put up with enough of your B.S. the other 11 months of the year that you ought to leave our right to celebrate as this country has always celebrated alone.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. c3
    December 6th, 2008 at 16:44
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Every year we have to go through this. And the irony that seems to be lost on both Christians and non-Christians alike: the Christmas tree is not a Christian symbol. In fact if one wanted to have a “secular display” acknowledging the cultural and historical significance of Christmas then the idea symbol would be: the Christmas tree (and probably Santa).

  2. Grewgills
    December 6th, 2008 at 19:09
    Reply | Quote | #2

    What if those customs are what built the country that your school resides in? What if those customs form the core of what is quite frankly one of only a handful of nations in the world worth living in? And what if those quaint, discardable customs created the Constitution that grants you the freedom to denigrate the beliefs of the overwhelming majority of your countrymen and deny them the right to affirm their faith as their forefathers – and yours – did?

    But not at the expense of compromising American traditions and American’s freedom to worship as we always have.

    I call BS on both of those statements.
    Moving beyond the various religious beliefs of our founding fathers (some deist, some Christian, some agnostic, and at least one atheist), the first Christmas tree in America is variously reliably traced to somewhere in the mid 19th century and was not common practice for some time after that. Santa actually came to America before the tree and he was not popular from the beginning of our nation. Christmas did not even become a federal holiday until 1870, nearly a hundred or our ~230 years in. Congress was actually in session for the first American Christmas.

    I am not personally offended by any Christmas decorations, in fact I rather like them and the holiday*, but to contend that this is some sort of tradition that extends back to our founding fathers is demonstrably false.

    That said, government bodies giving prominence to one religion’s displays over those of other religions’ is of questionable Constitutionality. One remedy would be decorating for all religious holidays and maybe Darwin Days. Our streets would festive nearly the whole year round.

    * Although currently agnostic I enjoy the fun holidays from all traditions, religious and otherwise. We brought several American holidays with us when we lived in the Netherlands and brought Sinterklaas back with us and had the children in our household put their shoes by the fireplace. (belated grootjes to Michael)

  3. Tom
    December 6th, 2008 at 19:52
    Reply | Quote | #3

    I’d like to agree with both c3 and GG.

    It seems ridiculous that a non-Christian symbol of Christmas would be seen as threatening.

    In addition, I don’t see how a custom of putting up Christmas trees has anything to do with building America or creating the Constitution. Those were the result of things such as the Protestant work ethic, manifest destiny, etc….

    I think Moore is trying to relate Christian beliefs to the founding of America. In some ways this is understandable; the Protestant work ethic and America’s strongly Christian background are the result of the religious background of America’s earliest settlers.

    But GG has a point in that the founding fathers were of various beliefs. Indeed, Thomas Jefferson cut out parts of the Bible that he felt were too hard to believe. And our Bill of Rights would certainly clash with the beliefs of the Puritans, who maintained a theocracy.

  4. Michael Merritt
    December 6th, 2008 at 23:13
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Ant-Christian? Like has been presented above, that’s arguable, but perhaps. Anti-American, though? That’s a bit of stretch for me. Being part of the PC brigade doesn’t make you anti-American.

    Along with some of the other commenters above, I celebrate Christmas in its secular (or pagan depending on your view) traditions, Christmas tree and all. And also for the being with family stuff.

    I don’t know what’s up with UNC, but a Christmas tree is hardly threatening.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.