Hoist On Their Own Petards III
Many left-leaning critics have responded to reports of Democratic Illinois Governor Blagojevich’s blatant corruption scandal by highlighting Republican corruption scandals that led to sweeping electoral defeats in he 2006 Congressional elections. These observations are certainly valid, as political corruption knows no party. But that only serves to call into sharper relief the Democrats’ true problem here — they made so very much hay out of Republican corruption scandals, with Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi bragging about Democrats providing the “most ethical Congress in history” by way of contrast, that the growing string of venal corruption by Democrats compounds itself by adding on hypocrisy and unwarranted arrogance.
And Michelle Malkin has her rhetorical scalpel out for some payback after all the self-righteous trumpeting by Democrats for the last several years:
Democrats and the media can no longer rest on the old rationalization that Blago is an exception to the “we’re cleaner than thou” rule. 2008 was the year of Democratic Reps. William “Cold Cash” Jefferson, Charlie “Sweetheart Deals” Rangel, and former Detroit Mayor Kwame “Text Me” Kilpatrick. It was the year Democratic Massachusetts State Senator Dianne Wilkerson got caught stuffing bribes from an FBI informant down her shirt. It was the year 12 Democratic leaders and staffers in Pennsylvania’s state Capitol were stung in a massive corruption scandal involving cash, sex and abuse of public office. And it was the year of multimillion-dollar embezzlement scandals at Democratic satellite offices of ACORN and the SEIU.
The Democrats have met the culture of corruption, and it looks like it ain’t just elephants among the jackasses soiling public office.
Alas, it seems that whenever either party gains power to a degree that insulates it from effective institutional opposition and/or scrutiny by the media, some of its members are perfectly willing to assume that the rules of law no longer apply to them. Contrary to the pretensions of Democratic leaders (and bloggers) for the last 5 years, the pathology of corruption is not limited to Republicans. Yet, it is their prior insistence that it was an exclusively Republican sin that makes them ineffective in trying to redirect attention this time, especially since most conservative bloggers readily concede that corruption is a bipartisan problem.
Note to Democrats: When you overreach in trying to cast yourself as morally better than everyone that disagrees with you, it only serves to make the inevitable fall from grace harder to bear and make it harder to redirect attention by shifting the subject.










Nicely said, Jason. Yes, the Dems have been, to steal a line from James Thurber, ‘laboriously building the petard by which they have been hoist.’ No doubt about it, there is plenty of corruption on both sides of the aisle. And the Dems need to get busy and clean house. Quickly. Froma Harrop has an editorial in papers today calling for Speaker Pelosi to get serious about investigating Charles Rangel’s practices. I couldn’t agree more. She’s correct – Rangel is a personally charming fellow, and a Korean War vet, one of the founding leaders of the Congressional Balck Caucus – and someone who has fallen prey to the temptations which often trip up politicians. Of all parties. Having runh for four years on the charge of being clean and honest government types, the Dems need to deliver. That means cashiering their members who have been found ethically wanting.
I guess both glass houses are sufficiently shattered now.
I suggest the formation of the “Purity Party”. It would be founded on the highest possible ethical standards and the unwavering determination to do nothing that might be construed as wrong or unholy. It would have a strict “ex-communication” process, also. And to maintain its very high standards it would not propose nor participate in any legislation or administrative action.
The Democrats certainly made much of people like Duke Cunningham and Scooter Libby.
I wonder though…
Were Democratic objections to Republican practices focused primarily upon corruption? Or was it more focused on the bad decisions of the Bush administration and its supporters?
@Tom
There’s a difference?
(When you’re the source of all evil in the world are such distinctions meaningless?)