Chicago Sun-Times: Emanuel Actively Negotiating with Blagojevich

December 17th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

One of Chicago’s finest newspapers, the Chicago Sun-Times, reported Wednesday that several sources told the newspaper that Rahm Emanuel, president-elect Barack Obama’s Chief of Staff, was more actively involved in the decision making process regarding Obama’s Senate seat than previously admitted. According to these sources, Emanuel pressed Governor Rod Blagojevich into nominating a candidate acceptable to Obama in general and Valerie Jarrett, an Obama confidante, specifically.

“Emanuel privately urged Gov. Blagojevich’s administration to appoint Obama confidante Valerie Jarrett, and the Sun-Times learned Tuesday that he also pressed that it be done by a certain deadline,” the Sun-Times report says. “Jarrett was initially interested in the U.S. Senate post before Obama tapped her to be a White House senior adviser, sources say. The disclosure comes days after Obama’s camp downplayed Jarrett’s interest in the post.”

Team Obama’s strategy changed when Jarrett dropped out, so Emanuel presented Team Blagojevich with a list of ‘acceptable candidates.’

As the newspaper points out, the report does not indicate that Emanuel was involved in any pay to play schemes. Having said that, if correct, it does once again prove that Team Obama has not been entirely honest with the public about this matter. They first denied any involvement, next they played it down acting as if Emanuel did not say or do much, and they will now have to admit that Emanuel pursued a very aggressive strategy.

Most frustrating about this entire controversy with regards to Emanuel and Obama is that they have chosen to spin and lie instead of being honest and forthright. The change Obama promised seems to be even more stonewalling than we’re used to; he is more Clintonian than the Clintons.

Team Obama could have been transparent about this matter from the get-go, but chose to close shop instead, forcing journalists and bloggers alike to wonder what they are hiding. Whether or not they are hiding anything unethical remains to be seen. What this controversy does make clear, however, is that we may see a lot of stonewalling, secrecy and silence from an Obama administration. More than many thought.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Dave T
    December 18th, 2008 at 00:08
    Reply | Quote | #1

    And now suddenly, everyone is surprised???

    The media’s love for Obama caused it to simply ignore all the warning signs–Obama just being a politician from Chicago should have been enough to launch full-scale investigative reporting.

    Obama and Emmanuel are only doing what they always have done…but thanks to the “blind eyed” media, we had to wait until after the election to find out.

    What a sad state of affairs…

  2. c3
    December 18th, 2008 at 05:55
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Uh ohhh..

  3. danshanteal
    December 20th, 2008 at 21:58
    Reply | Quote | #3

    next comes the statement…”not the rahm i use to know”.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.