Iraqi Ambassador to U.S. Blasts Code Pink and Iraqi ‘Journalist’

December 17th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

When speaking at an event where anti-war activists of Code Pink were also present, Iraq’s Ambassador to the United States Mr. Samir Sumaida’ie took the time to respond to the Code Pinkers’ support for Muntader al-Zaidi, the journalist who threw his shoes at President George W. Bush visited Baghdad recently.

“Mr. Muntader al-Zaidi is very lucky that it was Mr. Bush and Mr. Maliki and not Saddam Hussein” he threw the shoe at, Sumaida’ie said. Because had it been Mr. Saddam Hussein you would be carrying a different plaque by now.”

“Number 2, in our culture, I know that people have told you that, throwing shoes at someone is an insult. But, it is a bigger insult to the host not the guest; in our culture anyone who insults a guest is insulting the host. To a double degree.

“So even if it was a local tribal leader, he would not have stomached that behavior. So in our culture we believe that what Mr al-Zeidi did was reprehensible; it was not representative of the way we behave, as Iraqis; it diminished us as a nation, we’re better than that. We have issues [...] but we believe that we should always behave in a dignified manner and in a correct manner,” Sumaida’ie concluded.

Watch the video:

YouTube Preview Image

Most shocking about the controversy surrounding Mr. al-Zeidi was not his behavior, nor the reaction of some people in the Middle East. Rather, it was the reaction of anti-war and anti-American Americans who celebrated this ‘journalist’ as if he were some kind of hero.

Lest these individuals forget, Mr. al-Zeidi is a supporter of Muqtada al-Sadr: the radical Shiite cleric, responsible for the death of thousands of innocent Sunnis, who wants to turn Iraq into a radical Shiite state, led by him as Grand Ayatollah. Additionally, Mr. al-Zeidi pretends to be a journalist: throwing shoes at a head of state is not professional behavior. Rather, it is the behavior of an activist pretending to be a professional. Thirdly, one should always treat a foreign head of state with respect. This is because the individual does not represent himself, but his entire country and thus, people. Bush was not visiting Baghdad as the private person George W. Bush, but as the American president. Insulting him equals insulting the American people.

Mr. Sumaida’ie was correct: the episode was a disgrace for Iraq. But he forgot to add that the reaction of far-left activists in the United States was even more disgraceful.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. c3
    December 18th, 2008 at 05:54
    Reply | Quote | #1

    And I would add that Malicki’s feeble “in the moment” response added to the disgrace.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.