Obama’s Choice of Rick Warren is Inspired

December 18th, 2008 By: marc moore | Tags:

Barack Obama’s choice of pastor Rick Warren to give the invocation at his presidential inauguration is a good one.  Warren, whose book The Purpose Driven Life has inspired millions of Americans, represents American values – and American citizens – far better than the far-left zealots who are frothing at the mouth over Obama’s decision.  Is Warren-gate a plot to make middle America fall under Obama’s spell?  A final rejection of the mob-rule progressive agenda?  An act that finally tells us who and what Barack Obama really values?

One thing is certain: the uber-liberals in the progressive left hate the idea more than I could have possibly imagined a couple of days ago.

Jane Hamsher of the all-but-unreadable FireDogLake says that ""Inclusiveness" does not meaning putting whatever hatemonger you can find onto the program" and goes on to compare Warren to the Grand Wizard of the K.K.K., of all idiotic things.

At the Nation, Sarah Posner one-ups Hamsher, saying:

Warren represents the absolute worst of the Democrats’ religious outreach, a right-winger masquerading as a do-gooder anointed as the arbiter of what it means to be faithful. Obama’s religious outreach was intended, supposedly, to make religious voters more comfortable with him and feel included in the Democratic Party. But that outreach now has come at the expense of other people’s comfort and inclusion, at an event meant to mark a turning point away from divisive politics.

What ever gave Posner and the progressives that an Obama presidency was going to mandate the "inclusion" of all of their alliance of fringe groups and their ultra-liberal agendas?  Any American president worthy of the title is going to govern to obtain the most good for the most people while minimizing the undue influence of radical fringe groups at either end of the spectrum.

Posner admits that Obama was almost bound to choose a Christian minister to deliver the invocation.  Why?  Because that’s the way it’s done in this country, still, despite the left’s best efforts to completely abridge Christianity from public life. 

As Posner says, at the core of the left’s hatred of Warren is something he said during California’s campaign to correct the state court’s mis-definition of marriage:

there are about 2 percent of Americans are homosexual, gay, lesbian people. We should not let 2 percent of the population…change a definition of marriage that has been supported by every single culture and every single religion for 5,000 years.

That is correct, both socially and politically, and it has nothing to do with Warren being a homophobe – it’s simple common sense.  If 2 percent of Americans decide that it’s appropriate to drive on the left side of the road, there’s no way that their wishes are going to be allowed to become law because the result would be a disaster.  Yet the vast majority of Americans are supposed to accept the far left’s redefinition of marriage, the fundamental unit of social cohesiveness?

The names that Warren is being called in the headlines of many major liberal blogs, including AmericaBlog where John Avarosis evidently felt no compunction about slandering Warren as a homophobe on the front page there, are completely out of bounds.

The liberals whose pro-abortion, pro-gay agendas are threatened by the likes of Rick Warren are unabashedly hostile to Warren, Christianity, and Barack Obama’s inevitable and much-needed turn to the center of American demographics.  This last represents a betrayal in their mind and is not entirely unjustified.  After all, Obama won their votes going away over Hillary Clinton and John McCain and now he pays them back with this, what must seem like the final rejection.

What’s really telling about progressives’ hate-filled diatribes is their complete and utter refusal to admit that they are, when the votes are all counted, some of them more than once, at the left edge of American politics, a small minority of radical voters whose loud, abrasive rhetoric gains them more attention than they deserve.

Anyone who crosses words or deeds with them is a hate-filled bigot, a homophobe, a racist, a mouth-breathing, woman-defiling wife beater.  There is no other truth but their own; all opposition must be denied and disgraced because there is no other truth but liberal talking points.  Abortion = Good, Gay Marriage = Good, Taxes = Good.  No one is allowed to disagree.  That’s some inclusiveness, I’ll say.

That’s why we should all relish Barack Obama’s inspirational choice of Rick Warren.  For a moment a political leader rose above the din of his militant constituency and chose to embrace the real values of America.  He was not my choice for president, but I hope that this is only the first of many such triumphs that Barack Obama will lead us to.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Jay_C
    December 18th, 2008 at 23:06
    Reply | Quote | #1

    “The names that Warren is being called in the headlines of many major liberal blogs, including AmericaBlog where John Avarosis evidently felt no compunction about slandering Warren as a homophobe on the front page there, are completely out of bounds.”

    I would “hope” the leftest of lefties would “change”.. I guess not..

  2. Jay_C
    December 18th, 2008 at 23:10
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Jason is right… (from his past comments), in political circles, most of the frothing anger these days is coming from the left. In a time where you would think they would be overjoyed to just “throw the rascal (Bush)out”. ….Got cake?

  3. Tom
    December 19th, 2008 at 03:57
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Somehow, Marc, in this very long post you’ve forgotten to mention one of the main things that people on the Left, and especially gays, are upset about in regards to Rick Warren.

    In an interview with Beliefnet, Warren stated that he doesn’t believe in gay marriage any more than he believes in adults marrying children, sisters marrying brothers, and men marrying multiple wives. When asked by interviewer Steven Waldman if he was, in fact, equating gay marriage with these things Warren said yes.

    So Rick Warren apparently believes that gay marriage is the equivalent of pedophilia, incest, and polygamy. And, at least for the gay community, that’s what they’re upset about.

    Might have been nice if you’d remembered to include that, it makes the situation a little easier to understand.

  4. Tom
    December 19th, 2008 at 05:46
    Reply | Quote | #4

    And just a quick technical note…it’s not just the 2% (or 5% or 10% or however many gays there are supposed to be) of gays who are asking for marriage rights; in California 48% voted against Proposition 8, which has to include lots of heterosexuals. Less among America in general, more like 35% or 40%.

    And a deeper concern: I can see how driving on the left side of the road could hurt other people. I can’t see how allowing gays to marry would hurt regular, heterosexual marriage. It’s not like accepting gay marriage means that you have to ban straight marriage. And, contrary to what Rick Warren thinks, it doesn’t automatically lead to pedophilia, incest, etc…any more than allowing killing in self-defence leads to first-degree murder.

    Tell me Marc, has gays getting married in California or Massachusetts caused you to get divorced?

  5. PoliGazette » Obama and Warren
    December 19th, 2008 at 07:27
    #5
  6. Interested
    December 19th, 2008 at 12:52
    Reply | Quote | #6

    But that outreach now has come at the expense of other people’s comfort and inclusion

    If there was ever a quote that summed up the “party of tolerence” it is that one. Heaven forbid if you make us uncomfortable, but we’re fine with you being uncomfortable.

    Oh god did I say heaven?

    the Left could have drank a little less cool-aid over the past 12 years.

  7. Jay_C
    December 19th, 2008 at 16:46
    Reply | Quote | #7

    Devil’s Advocate…I heard this argument the other day…Have we been wrong through 10,000 years of human history (In most “major” religions as far as I know –Hindu, Muslim, Buddhism, Christianity etc.) to define Marriage as between a man and a woman? IF so, can the argument “we have evolved to allow this” really apply here? If we have evolved, where is the physical scientific evidence of this (Darwinian)evolution (what physical evidence of evolution now versus through 10,000 years of history)..Again, this is not my argument, just thought it was a different angle I hadn;t heard before.

    on a different note–my opinion: It is interensting how Warren get’s scathing remarks from the left, for his stance on gay marriage, yet Obama doesn’t get nearly as harsh a treatment. (If anything, Obama gets a shocked / suprised /sad..”I can’t beleive you picked this guy.. I thought you supported all us lefties” kind of an attitide..I call that Hypocracy. THEY BOTH have the same stance. Don’t agree with it.

  8. Jay_C
    December 19th, 2008 at 17:17
    Reply | Quote | #8

    In the end I think all these right / centrist stance showboating is all to appease / calm the right before he holds any real power. It’s all smoke and Mirrors to me. (Meaining he is doing all this supposed “conservative…look at me” stuff before he got into office.) We need to judge him on his actions, observe how “centrist, or conservative or pragmatic” he is when he holds the keys to the whit ehouse in his pocket. That is when it really matters.

  9. Orson Buggeigh
    December 28th, 2008 at 16:08

    Bravo to Obama for reaching out ot the religious right. When President Bush was campaigning, he promised to ‘be a uniter, not a divider,’ and failed. That doesn’t mean it was a bad idea. Obama has promised the same thing, in different words. Obama wants ‘to be the President of all Americans, including those who didn’t vote for me.’ (paraphrase). I agreed with President Bush then, and I agree with President Elect Obama now. The President needs to reach out to all Americans. That includes the folks who did not support you, and yes, the most radical partisans will be unhappy. Too bad for them. Rick Warren is a good choice as a well respected pastor.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.