Newt Gingrich: Republican Grandfather

December 21st, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Newt Gingrich is a strange fellow: he was the leader of the Republican Revolution in 1994, leading his party to a tremendous victory in the elections for Congress; he then led the firm and passionate opposition against Bill Clinton yet was able to cooperate with Clinton when the two could agree on a common approach to a shared problem; he was and is a man of great political skills and ideas yet often lost himself in petty partisan bickering; he is considered a leading Republican who has no chance whatsoever of winning presidential elections; he is highly intelligent but also willing to do everything for media attention; he led a Republican Party rooted in social conservatism and moral values yet cheated on his wife more than once.

In short, Gingrich is the kind of man who embodies “complicated.”

In an article for Politico, Daniel Libit tries to figure Gingrich out. After reading the article in its entirety an objective reader can only conclude one thing: Libit has come to the conclusion that Gingrich is too complicated a man to ‘figure out.’ The only man who may understand Gingrich fully is Gingrich himself. The rest of us mere mortals can only look at him in amazement, praising him for his strengths, criticizing his flaws.

What is clear, however, is that Gingrich is a great opposition leader. Once in power, Gingrich loses many of his strenghts – passionate yet intelligent reasoning, an air of being an outsider. But considering the situation the Republican Party has found itself in after the 08 elections, Gingrich seems to be the man who can help lead the party out of the swamp and into paradise.

This does not mean that Gingrich should be the public or even de facto leader of the party. Rather, he should be the one who helps his party articulate new and clear ideas, explain them to voters, and energize voters. If not the public leader, he could be the man behind the curtains: advising his party’s public leaders, encouraging them, assisting them. He can also go on national television every now and then, voicing Republican opposition to Barack Obama and the Democratic-led Congress.

When elections are near, however, Gingrich should refrain from running for office: he will do his party a better service by being who he is today; a man of ideas, of inspired opposition, a voice of (conservative) reason.

He should, in short, be the GOP’s grandfather: that old and wise man, who gives his children and grandchildren advise on family and professional matters.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. c3
    December 22nd, 2008 at 18:33
    Reply | Quote | #1

    One word to describe Gingrich: argumentative.
    (yes he has good ideas and yes he can rally an opposition) but he too much likes to spout thoughts/ideas that will upset.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.