Child Slavery in America

December 30th, 2008 By: Michael Merritt | Tags:

It’s something we often think of as happening somewhere else, but little do people in America realize that a new form of slavery has arisen in America.  Yet, child trafficking is alive in the United States, but it garners little discussion.  Rukmini Callimachi at the AP has recently written an article chronicling the experience of a former child slave who was brought from Egypt to work for an Egyptian family in California.

The trafficking of children for domestic labor in the U.S. is an extension of an illegal but common practice in Africa. Families in remote villages send their daughters to work in cities for extra money and the opportunity to escape a dead-end life. Some girls work for free on the understanding that they will at least be better fed in the home of their employer.

The problem with the perception that the people forcing children into servitude have is that, whatever the child’s life was before, slavery is slavery.

The custom has led to the spread of trafficking, as well-to-do Africans accustomed to employing children immigrate to the U.S. Around one-third of the estimated 10,000 forced laborers in the United States are servants trapped behind the curtains of suburban homes, according to a study by the National Human Rights Center at the University of California at Berkeley and Free the Slaves, a nonprofit group. No one can say how many are children, especially since their work can so easily be masked as chores.

Once behind the walls of gated communities like this one, these children never go to school. Unbeknownst to their neighbors, they live as modern-day slaves, just like Shyima, whose story is pieced together through court records, police transcripts and interviews.

Basically, nobody is doing anything, because nobody knows who these childen are.  And they’re not talking, apparently because many think it’s normal.

It never occurred to her to run away.

“I thought this was normal,” she said.

I don’t think it takes much reading of the article to see what’s going on here.  I’m inclined to agree with commenters at Ed Morrissey’s blog post on the article who say it’s not so much of an African problem as it is one of religion – in particular, Islam.  Callimachi chose his words carefully, but all the countries mentioned in his article – Nigeria, Morocco, Egypt, Cameroon – all have significant Muslim populations.

If this is a wider problem on the African continent, let me know, but where then are the reports of this coming from Benin, Congo, Liberia or elsewhere?  So without clarification, that leaves a particularly conservative following of Islam as a result.  One that allows for this type of servitude because it’s seen as normal.  If you listen to the interview with Shyima, she says she saw it all the time in Egypt.  And even if it’s not Islam per se, it definitely comes from a society that has been influenced by it.

Look, I’m not going to tell somebody how to run their country, but when you move here, it’s good to know which values to follow.  The ones saying “no child labor” are pretty non-negotiable in my book.  Because of this slavery, Shyima was denied educational opportunities for many years, in addition to the lack of learning during her first years in poverty in Egypt.  These things are not something any child should have to deal with, and although law enforcement should be commended for finding cases where they can, it’s too bad more can’t be done, except by vigilance.

Too bad the couple don’t seem to have gotten the hint, even after a stint in jail and deportation:

EPILOGUE: On a recent afternoon in Cairo, Madame Amal walked into the lobby of her apartment complex wearing designer sunglasses and a chic scarf.

After nearly two years in a U.S. prison cell, she’s living once more in the spacious apartment where Shyima first worked as her maid. The apartment is adorned in the style of a Louis XIV palace, with ornately carved settees, gold-leaf vases and life-sized portraits of her and her husband.

She did not agree to be interviewed for this story.

Before the door closed behind her, a little girl slipped in carrying grocery bags. She wore a shabby T-shirt. Her small feet slapped the floor in loose flip-flops. Her eyes were trained on the ground.

She looked to be around 9 years old.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Mike
    December 31st, 2008 at 15:55
    Reply | Quote | #1

    This is very sad, but what is most sad is that the parents are probably right that the child is better off as a slave than otherwise. Don’t get me wrong: we should stop this. As a matter of principle, being a slave should not be tolerated. However, it can’t be ignored that if we are successful at stopping the exchange of child-slaves, the children could end up in worse shape. So any effort to curb this trend should include world-wide efforts to curb the poverty that is driving it.

  2. sally makintosh
    February 3rd, 2010 at 21:45
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I think all child slavery in the U.S. should be banned. No one child should be treated this way. It is just wrong!

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.