Medvedev Becoming “Assertive”

December 31st, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

According to the Financial Times, Russia’s President Dmitry Medvedev is starting to worry Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and the latter’s allies. The reason: Medvedev is becoming increasingly assertive, paying less respect to Putin and being more outspoken about his own (constitutional) powers.

Ever since Medvedev took over from Putin, because Putin had to resign after two straight terms as president, experts inside and outside of Russia took care to explain to readers and viewers that Putin remained the true power in Moscow. Medvedev, it was said, was Putin’s strongman; he was installed to take over from Putin for a couple of years after which Putin would return for (at the very least) two more terms as president.

Medvedev seemed more than willing to function as the formal but not true leader of his country; he spoke about Putin with tremendous respect, telling everyone who asked that he “consulted” with his predecessor before he made any (big) decisions.

The last couple of weeks have seen a change in Medvedev’s attitude and interviews, however. “The final responsibility for what happens in the country and for the important decisions taken would rest on my shoulders alone and I would not be able to share this responsibility with anyone,” Mr Medvedev told an interviewer recently for instance.

Putin and his allies are, meanwhile, wondering whether the change means that Medvedev will try to establish its authority more actively than they thought he would and whether or not he will be willing to step aside when Putin wants to make his grand planned comeback.

Be that as it may, the two can still get along personally; considering especially Putin’s character, this implies that he does not truly fear Medvedev(’s ambitions). If he did, he would dispose of Medvedev, accuse him of one crime against the state or another, and take his place.

It will be interesting to see where this goes in the coming weeks and months, however. Putin can be considered more authoritarian and less inclined to compromise than his successor. If Medvedev would succeed in drawing more power to himself and preventing Putin from pursuing his plans, the rest of the world would most likely be well served. Putin is the hawk of the two, the man wants to restore Russia’s power and sphere of influence by, if necessary, creating a second Cold War. Medvedev seems different, more moderate.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. M E Janssen
    January 1st, 2009 at 02:07
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Maybe Putin is right where he wants to be – in charge of the government without having to run for office and shake hands and smile for the cameras. He answers to only 1 man, whom he trusts. Let Medvedev deal with the broad generalities and let Putin dive headfirst into the details. I suspect Putin prefers that, even if it means Medvedev’s liberal ideas force a re-arrangement of some details. Lately, Putin reminds me of Cardinal Richelieu, who was comfortable with letting the king be a king (as long as it was Richelieu who was watching his back).

  2. David
    January 1st, 2009 at 12:41
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Yes. Wasn’t Emperor Augustine officially only a Tribune (a minor official) who kept all the institutions of Republican Rome in existence, but stripped them of their actual power. Maybe history will look at Putin as Emperor Vladamir….

  3. Charles Phillips
    January 1st, 2009 at 19:11
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Chances are good that Medvedev is about to go on a long vacation! Vladimir Putin has to worry about Dmitry starting to think that he is actually in charge.

  4. David
    January 1st, 2009 at 21:58
    Reply | Quote | #4

    I see that the Wall Street Journal has an article about Russia today. It suggests that there is speculation that Medvedev will officially take the blame for the economic crisis and resign, leaving the way open for a new Presidential election with the now amended constitution. I wonder who the candidates would be in these circumstances? :)

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.