The World, Israel and Gaza

January 4th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

I am currently watching Al Jazeera, the Dubai based news channel founded by BBC journalists, where they cover the Israeli ground offensive in Gaza breathlessly. 

One of the main questions the AJ correspondents and their experts ask is why the world (or international) community is not speaking out against Israel’s offensive. As AJ rightfully explains to the public, the attacks do not merely cause suffering to Hamas, the terrorist organization, but to all Palestinians living in Gaza.

What these experts and correspondents fail to grasp, seemingly, is that “the rest of the world” is not as concerned about the Palestine-Israel conflict as they are. The world is more interested in its own affairs than it is in the affairs of a people who seem bent on self destruction, who are indoctrinated with hatred, and who cause problem after problem.

‘The world’ has tried to negotiate between the two sides for decades, but nothing has worked thus far. Both sides, some will say, are not willing to compromise. Most foreigners and foreign governments have given up hope – the suffering on both sides is terrible, but what are non-Israelis and non-Palestinians going to do about it? An international force could be sent to the region, which would make it difficult for Israel to attack targets in Israel and to build more settlements, obviously, but it would also mean that these forces will have to take on Palestinian terrorist organizations. Not one country in the world is willing to do so.

Lastly there is the fact that most foreign governments accept and even respect Fatah, but virtually no one, except for Iran, takes Hamas serious as a possible partner for peace. Hamas is a tool of Iran, and every country in the world knows it. It is a terrorist organization with whom serious negotiations are not possible. In other words: at best people do not care about Hamas, and at worst they want it removed from power.

It is all about realpolitik, and in my opinion rightfully so. Most leaders care about their own country, and that country’s interests. Most realize that Hamas is a destructive force with whom negotiations are difficult if not impossible. The conflict between Palestinians and Israelis have gone on for decades and, many believe, is likely to continue for years possibly decades to follow. With little to no hope for a peaceful solution, why would ‘the world’ become actively involved in the matter?

Everything changes of course at the moment ‘the public’ and ‘voters’ force their governments to act in one way or another. This makes it in their leaders’ interest to intervene, so as to prevent massive protests, revolts or, in democracies, a massive slide in the polls for the ruling party.

Meanwhile, here is a video of MSNBC about the Israeli offensive:


Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Michael Merritt
    January 4th, 2009 at 10:15
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I’ll tell you why I’m cynical of this situation. Because it seems that every Israeli I’ve seen discussing this lately could care less to make peace with the Palestinians.

  2. David
    January 4th, 2009 at 11:56
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Making peace requires at least some good faith on both sides. This seems totally lacking from Hamas.

    The Israeli withdrawal from Gaza was an experiment on their part. They had exhausted dialogue due to Palistinian bad faith, so why not try just giving the Palestinians a state unilaterally. Well we can see how that has worked out.

  3. Jason, Managing Editor
    January 4th, 2009 at 16:47
    Reply | Quote | #3

    It seems wrong to hold any group responsible for failing to be interested in making peace with an opposing group that is openly committed to their genocidal destruction, Michael.

    After its election to government, Hamas was pressed internationally to repudiated its call for genocide against the Jews. Hamas refused to do so and has continued to attack Israel at every opportunity, with special focus on civilian targets. That behavior combined with their longstanding genocidal rhetoric says all that needs to be said. Would you have said that European Jews in the 1930s and 1940s should be faulted for their disinterest in making peace with the Nazis? Because this is one of the rare cases where the “Godwin’s Law” comparison is actually legitimate — Hamas is basically exactly like the Nazis.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.