Big Hollywood: Taking Conservatism to Liberalism’s Heartland

January 5th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

 

Big Hollywood Here Michael Comes

Big Hollywood Here Michael Comes. Image: Ela Design

The co-founder of the Huffington Post and former contributor to the Drudge Report, Andrew Breitbart, has taken on a new venture which could become a highly influential member of the online media community: Big Hollywood.

Big Hollywood will be the blog of Breitbart.com – a site which has existed for some time now, and the favorite source of news for 1 million (or so) people per day. 

 Big Hollywood’s big goal? To combat Hollywood’s intolerant liberal culture; bringing a tolerant conservatism to liberal’s heartland. and, by doing so, improve America. As Breitbart himself explained to TheHill: “My primary goal is to diversify Hollywood. Those people [in Hollywood] who dissent are so summarily attacked and dismissed that they learn to just keep their mouths shut. And there’s nothing I like more than to have debate free and open in America.”

“I’m arguing that pop culture isn’t just superfluous,” Breitbart says. In the “stream of American popular culture,” he says, attitudes and behaviors portrayed in movies and other pop-culture outlets eventually become policy issues.

“The movies used to reinforce good behavior — that you should pay back your loans,” he says, using the country’s credit crisis as an example. “I think you’re going to get better-behaving Americans … you’re going to have a better society if you treat Hollywood like the important entity it is.”

His strategy to do so is to convince (Washington) conservatives to care about Hollywood, which has a major impact on American society and culture and on America’s image abroad. Several big political names - House Minority Leader Rep. John Boehner (R-Ohio), incoming Minority Whip Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.) and Reps. Thaddeus McCotter (R-Mich.), Mary Bono Mack (R-Calif.) and Connie Mack (R-Fla.) – have already agreed to contribute to Big Hollywood. 

Not only will politicians contribute, the site’s editor-in-chief will be John Nolte, Tucker Carlson has agreed to contribute and several individuals writing for outlets such as National Review, The Weekly Standard and Commentary magazine have done so as well. 

Since the focus will be on Hollywood, Breitbart has also ‘wooed conservative screenwriters, comedy writers, classical musicians and alternative singer-songwriters to contribute to the blog.’ Hollywood conservatives who fear liberal revenge are allowed to write under a pseudonym. 

In short, Breitbart is busily assembling a true dreamteam, which will blow your mind away. The names of the people mentioned – and more will undoubtedly be added in the coming days, weeks and even months – make one thing clear: Big Hollywood is going to have a major impact, just like the HuffPo and Drudge had.

And then an announcement: I too have been asked by Andrew Breitbart to contribute to Big Hollywood. I of course happily accepted: I will be the politically conservative European liberal Muslim voice (let that sink in for a while). My first entry will be about Hollywood (movies) and America’s image abroad: does Hollywood increase anti-Americanism and does it confirm the anti-American caricature already existing?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. C Stanley
    January 5th, 2009 at 15:48
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I will be the politically conservative European liberal Muslim voice

    LOL- I think you must be a demographic group of one, Michael.

  2. Michael van der Galien
    January 5th, 2009 at 16:01
    Reply | Quote | #2

    LMAO. But… there are conservatives, there are europeans, and there are liberal muslims. if i can reach all three of them: woppa, instant hit!

  3. Dale
    January 6th, 2009 at 05:24
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Michael, as someone who is…interested in “pop” culture, but hates
    the stereotypical liberal mentality of Big Hollywoods decadent culture,
    I look forward to reading the views of yourself and others in Andrews
    Big Hollywood. We need more than just TMZ to take the blotted egos of
    the Hollywierd elite down a few notches. Best of luck to you both on
    your new venture.

  4. Michael van der Galien
    January 6th, 2009 at 14:19
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Thank you Dale – Are you working in Hollywood (or closely connected to it), if I may ask? If so, or if you know a few things about Hollywood and pop culture (I interpret “interest” as an understatement, correct me if I’m wrong), keep an eye on it and contact Andrew; the idea is to establish a grand team of conservatives (libertarians, moderates and moderate conservatives), willing to take on Hollywood’s liberal arrogant and intolerance.

  5. sharise parviz
    January 9th, 2009 at 17:21
    Reply | Quote | #6

    I am proud to say the Conservative movement is on. I am a conservative actress in Hollywood and am proud to have “come out of the closet.”
    it is time for our voices to be heard and to end the discrimination in Hollywood.

  6. C Stanley
    January 9th, 2009 at 17:43
    Reply | Quote | #7

    sharise, if you can manage to get work despite your political beliefs, there are many of us who will go out of our way to support you. I always make a point of seeing films with actors who are outspoken conservatives (Jon Voigt, Jim Caveziel, etc- who also happen to be very fine actors.)

    If this movement gains momentum, would it not be possible that someone with clout and capitol might start a screen actors guild or a studio which at least promises to have a neutral policy on political affiliations?

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.