Fighting Against Violent Leftists

January 5th, 2009 By: Michael Merritt | Tags:

Via Ed Morrissey at Hot Air is the story of a liberal social activist who became an informant for the FBI and helped stop a plot to make (and presumably use) firebombs during the Republican National Convention in September.

From the Statesman:

In a federal courtroom in Minneapolis this month, the public transformation of Brandon Darby of Austin will become complete.

In four years, he has gone from a never-trust-the-government activist to the confidential informant who helped the FBI arrest two Austin men on suspicion of building firebombs during the Republican National Convention in St. Paul in September.

The reaction of this news from some of his former activists?  To call him a traitor to their cause.  What?  Were you expecting something else?

“Everyone that knew Brandon has gone through a whole range of emotions. Clearly, he’s betrayed the trust of the community, and all the communities he’s worked with,” said Lisa Fithian, a social-justice activist who worked with Darby in Austin.

Heh.  A guy tries to stop violence from being committed and he’s betrayed the community?  I assume Fithian enjoys committing acts of violence to emphasize her point.  The comment shows that she just doesn’t get it.  If stopping violence is betrayal, well, we can take all the betrayal we can get from members of such a community.

But after helping out during Hurricane Katrina, where he developed his attitudes toward government and law enforcement, Darby found out what he was getting in to.

But he said that while working there, he concluded that some activists seemed more intent on promoting radical agendas than helping people.

As for why he got involved with the FBI, Darby said it was because he discovered that people he knew were planning violence.

“Somebody had asked me to do something that would’ve resulted in hurting people, and I said no,” he said. “So they started asking other people. At that point, that’s when I went forward and contacted somebody in law enforcement.”

A lot of people who develop similar emotions can be easily taken in by such groups.  We’ve seen it happen a lot in the Middle East, and certainly it can happen in the U.S.  But it does take a strong will and a realization of right and wrong in order to combat such temptation.  And Darby had that.  Of course, he has at least a slightly more life experience than what I’d guess the two guys in the pictures from the article have.  Darby is 32.

So, he should be commended for his work with the FBI.  Violent activism is never good activism in my book.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Bilbo Baggins
    January 5th, 2009 at 21:17
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Brandon Darby has a long record of escalating conflict between activists and law enforcement. He is not only a snitch on a social movement he proclaims to support, he is a agent provocateur, goading people into taking more militant action than they would have otherwise. He also began working with the FBI at least 6 months before he met the 2 Texans he claims planned to commit property destruction. This chicken came before the egg.

    http://brandondarby.com

  2. Crimson Politics
    January 5th, 2009 at 22:16
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Intolerance and Ignorance has no political party, it’s everywhere.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.